In CodeChecker you may compare analysis results either in the command line or in the web UI. With this tool, you can express pull request analysis (did my pull request introduce/fix any bugs?), and branch history analysis (did a change on my branch introduce/fix any bugs?). This document describes different use-cases for how locally stored analysis results, as well as remotely stored analysis results can be compared, and how other components of CodeChecker (source-code suppressions, review status rules, tags) affect the result of this set.
From the outlook, diff sounds like a very simple feature (and it is!), but it also a powerful tool that allows CodeChecker, among other things, to be used as a gating tool. For this reason, you can express rather complicated queries with it using various filters -- this documents intends to help to understand the expected behaviour of diff in these cases as well.
The term "diff" means the comparison in between the outstanding reports in a "before" (baseline) and an "after" (new or newline) analysis sets. Results are displayed in the same
format as CodeChecker cmd results. A report is outstanding if all of the following is true:
- its detection status is new, reopened or unresolved,
- its review status is unreviewed or confirmed. In a nutshell, outstanding reports are those that should be fixed: they are either still detected in the codebase, are unreviewed or confirmed to be true positives. Every other report is considered closed.
You can compare both local analysis results (see CodeChecker analyze) and results stored on the server (see CodeChecker store). In fact, you can compare local and remote analyses against one other! We call these in order local-local, remote-remote, and local-remote or remote-local diffs.
diff is the primary tool to tell if from the "before" set to the "after" set
- a new outstanding report appeared,
- a report was resolved
- a report is still outstanding (unresolved).
Generally speaking, diff allows you to express high level source code quality questions:
- Serverless Pull Request Analysis: Both the analysis result of the baseline (e.g. master branch) and the new code (e.g. soon-to-be pull request) is stored in local report folders, which are then compared to find out new/resolved reports.
- Local/Server Pull Request Analysis: The analysis of a new code (e.g. soon-to-be pull request) is stored locally, while the baseline (e.g. master branch) is on the server.
- Server based Pull Request Analysis: Both the analysis result of the baseline (e.g. master branch) and the new code (e.g. pull request) is located on the server.
- Server based branch history analysis: When making changes to a pull request / branch, analyses of the changes can be stored on the same run. This can be used whether a change on the PR/branch fixed or introduced a new bug.
This allows you to add CodeChecker to your CI loops by checking if a patch introduced a new bug, and you can identify if a patch fixed an existing bug.
$ CodeChecker cmd diff --help (click to expand)
usage: CodeChecker cmd diff [-h] [-b BASE_RUNS [BASE_RUNS ...]]
[-n NEW_RUNS [NEW_RUNS ...]] [--print-steps]
[--uniqueing {on,off}]
[--report-hash [REPORT_HASH [REPORT_HASH ...]]]
[--review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]]
[--detection-status [DETECTION_STATUS [DETECTION_STATUS ...]]]
[--severity [SEVERITY [SEVERITY ...]]]
[--bug-path-length BUG_PATH_LENGTH]
[--tag [TAG [TAG ...]]]
[--outstanding-reports-date TIMESTAMP]
[--file [FILE_PATH [FILE_PATH ...]]]
[--checker-name [CHECKER_NAME [CHECKER_NAME ...]]]
[--checker-msg [CHECKER_MSG [CHECKER_MSG ...]]]
[--analyzer-name [ANALYZER_NAME [ANALYZER_NAME ...]]]
[--component [COMPONENT [COMPONENT ...]]]
[--detected-at TIMESTAMP] [--fixed-at TIMESTAMP]
[--detected-before TIMESTAMP]
[--detected-after TIMESTAMP]
[--fixed-before TIMESTAMP]
[--fixed-after TIMESTAMP] [-s]
(--new | --resolved | --unresolved)
[--url PRODUCT_URL]
[-o {plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} [{plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} ...]]
[-e EXPORT_DIR] [-c]
[--verbose {info,debug_analyzer,debug}]
Compare two analysis runs to show the results that differ between the two.
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-b BASE_RUNS [BASE_RUNS ...], --basename BASE_RUNS [BASE_RUNS ...]
The 'base' (left) side of the difference: these
analysis runs are used as the initial state in the
comparison. The parameter can be multiple run names
(on the remote server), multiple local report
directories (result of the analyze command) or
baseline files (generated by the 'CodeChecker parse -e
baseline' command). In case of run name the the
basename can contain * quantifiers which matches any
number of characters (zero or more). So if you have
run-a-1, run-a-2 and run-b-1 then "run-a*" selects the
first two. In case of run names tag labels can also be
used separated by a colon (:) character:
"run_name:tag_name". A run name containing a literal
colon (:) must be escaped: "run\:name".
-n NEW_RUNS [NEW_RUNS ...], --newname NEW_RUNS [NEW_RUNS ...]
The 'new' (right) side of the difference: these
analysis runs are compared to the -b/--basename runs.
The parameter can be multiple run names (on the remote
server), multiple local report directories (result of
the analyze command) or baseline files (generated by
the 'CodeChecker parse -e baseline' command). In case
of run name the newname can contain * quantifiers
which matches any number of characters (zero or more).
So if you have run-a-1, run-a-2 and run-b-1 then
"run-a*" selects the first two. In case of run names
tag labels can also be used separated by a colon (:)
character: "run_name:tag_name". A run name containing
a literal colon (:) must be escaped: "run\:name".
--print-steps Print the steps the analyzers took in finding the
reported defect.
-o {plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} [{plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} ...], --output {plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} [{plaintext,rows,table,csv,json,html,gerrit,codeclimate} ...]
The output format(s) to use in showing the data.
- html: multiple html files will be generated in the
export directory.
- gerrit: a 'gerrit_review.json' file will be
generated in the export directory.
- codeclimate: a 'codeclimate_issues.json' file will
be generated in the export directory.
For the output formats (json, gerrit, codeclimate) if
an export directory is set the output files will be
generated if not the results are printed to the stdout
but only if one format was selected. (default:
['plaintext'])
-e EXPORT_DIR, --export-dir EXPORT_DIR
Store the output in the given folder.
-c, --clean Delete output results stored in the output directory.
(By default, it would keep output files and overwrites
only those that contain any reports).
filter arguments:
--uniqueing {on,off} The same bug may appear several times if it is found
on different execution paths, i.e. through different
function calls. By turning on uniqueing a report
appears only once even if it is found on several
paths. (default: off)
--report-hash [REPORT_HASH [REPORT_HASH ...]]
Filter results by report hashes.
--review-status [REVIEW_STATUS [REVIEW_STATUS ...]]
Filter results by review statuses.
Reports can be assigned a review status of the
following values:
- Unreviewed: Nobody has seen this report.
- Confirmed: This is really a bug.
- False positive: This is not a bug.
- Intentional: This report is a bug but we don't want
to fix it. This can be used only if basename or
newname is a run name (on the remote server).
(default: ['unreviewed', 'confirmed'])
--detection-status [DETECTION_STATUS [DETECTION_STATUS ...]]
Filter results by detection statuses.
The detection status is the latest state of a bug
report in a run. When a unique report is first
detected it will be marked as New. When the report is
stored again with the same run name then the detection
status changes to one of the following options:
- Resolved: when the bug report can't be found after
the subsequent storage.
- Unresolved: when the bug report is still among the
results after the subsequent storage.
- Reopened: when a Resolved bug appears again.
- Off: The bug was reported by a checker that was
switched off during the last analysis which results
were stored.
- Unavailable: were reported by a checker that does
not exists in the analyzer anymore because it was
removed or renamed. This can be used only if basename
or newname is a run name (on the remote server).
(default: ['new', 'reopened', 'unresolved'])
--severity [SEVERITY [SEVERITY ...]]
Filter results by severities.
--bug-path-length BUG_PATH_LENGTH
Filter results by bug path length. This has the
following format:
<minimum_bug_path_length>:<maximum_bug_path_length>.
Valid values are: "4:10", "4:", ":10"
--tag [TAG [TAG ...]]
Filter results by version tag names. This can be used
only if basename or newname is a run name (on the
remote server).
--outstanding-reports-date TIMESTAMP, --open-reports-date TIMESTAMP
Get results which were detected BEFORE the given date
and NOT FIXED BEFORE the given date. The detection
date of a report is the storage date when the report
was stored to the server for the first time. The
format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
--file [FILE_PATH [FILE_PATH ...]]
Filter results by file path. The file path can contain
multiple * quantifiers which matches any number of
characters (zero or more). So if you have /a/x.cpp and
/a/y.cpp then "/a/*.cpp" selects both.
--checker-name [CHECKER_NAME [CHECKER_NAME ...]]
Filter results by checker names. The checker name can
contain multiple * quantifiers which matches any
number of characters (zero or more). So for example
"*DeadStores" will matches "deadcode.DeadStores"
--checker-msg [CHECKER_MSG [CHECKER_MSG ...]]
Filter results by checker messages.The checker message
can contain multiple * quantifiers which matches any
number of characters (zero or more).
--analyzer-name [ANALYZER_NAME [ANALYZER_NAME ...]]
Filter results by analyzer names. The analyzer name
can contain multiple * quantifiers which match any
number of characters (zero or more). So for example
"clang*" will match "clangsa" and "clang-tidy".
--component [COMPONENT [COMPONENT ...]]
Filter results by source components. This can be used
only if basename or newname is a run name (on the
remote server).
--detected-at TIMESTAMP
DEPRECATED. Use the '--detected-after/--detected-
before' options to filter results by detection date.
Filter results by fix date (fixed after the given
date) if the --detection-status filter option is set
only to Resolved otherwise it filters the results by
detection date (detected after the given date). The
format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
--fixed-at TIMESTAMP DEPRECATED. Use the '--fixed-after/--fixed-before'
options to filter results by fix date. Filter results
by fix date (fixed before the given date) if the
--detection-status filter option is set only to
Resolved otherwise it filters the results by detection
date (detected before the given date). The format of
TIMESTAMP is 'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the
"time" part can be omitted, in which case midnight
(00:00:00) is used).
--detected-before TIMESTAMP
Get results which were detected before the given date.
The detection date of a report is the storage date
when the report was stored to the server for the first
time. The format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
--detected-after TIMESTAMP
Get results which were detected after the given date.
The detection date of a report is the storage date
when the report was stored to the server for the first
time. The format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
--fixed-before TIMESTAMP
Get results which were fixed before the given date.
The format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
--fixed-after TIMESTAMP
Get results which were fixed after the given date. The
format of TIMESTAMP is
'year:month:day:hour:minute:second' (the "time" part
can be omitted, in which case midnight (00:00:00) is
used).
comparison modes:
List reports that can be found only in baseline or new runs or in both. False
positive and intentional reports are considered as resolved, i.e. these are
excluded from the report set as if they were not reported.
--new Show results that didn't exist in the 'base' but
appear in the 'new' run.
--resolved Show results that existed in the 'base' but
disappeared from the 'new' run.
--unresolved Show results that appear in both the 'base' and the
'new' run.
common arguments:
--url PRODUCT_URL The URL of the product which will be accessed by the
client, in the format of
'[http[s]://]host:port/Endpoint'. (default:
localhost:8001/Default)
--verbose {info,debug_analyzer,debug}
Set verbosity level.
envionment variables:
CC_REPO_DIR Root directory of the sources, i.e. the directory where
the repository was cloned. Use it when generating gerrit
output.
CC_REPORT_URL URL where the report can be found. Use it when generating
gerrit output.
CC_CHANGED_FILES Path of changed files json from Gerrit. Use it when
generating gerrit output.
Exit status
------------------------------------------------
0 - No difference between baseline and newrun
1 - CodeChecker error
2 - There is at least one report difference between baseline and newrun
Example scenario: Compare multiple analysis runs
------------------------------------------------
Compare two runs and show results that didn't exist in the 'run1' but appear in
the 'run2' run:
CodeChecker cmd diff -b run1 -n run2 --new
Compare a remote run with a local report directory and show results that didn't
exist in the remote run 'run1' but appear in the local report directory:
CodeChecker cmd diff -b run1 -n /my_report_dir --new
Compare two runs and show results that exist in both runs and filter results
by multiple severity values:
CodeChecker cmd diff -b run1 -n run2 --unresolved --severity high medium
Compare a baseline file (generated by the 'CodeChecker parse -e baseline'
command) and a local report directory and show new results:
CodeChecker cmd diff -b /reports.baseline -n /my_report_dir --new
Here are some simple examples on the usage of diff from the command line interface:
- Compare locally stored analyses
./my_base_resultsand locally stored analysis./my_updated_results:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./my_base_results --newname ./my_updated_results --new
- Compare remotely stored runs "My Base Results" and "My Updated Results":
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "My Base Results" --newname "My Updated Results" --new
- Compare remotely stored runs against locally stored analyses:
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "My Base Results" --newname ./my_updated_results --new CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./my_base_results --newname "My Updated Results" --new
You can also compare runs on the web GUI one stored. On the "Run" page, on the right side of each report, you can see square shaped radio buttons. Clicking on the first one places the run into the "baseline" set, and clicking on the second places it in the "newline" set. After selecting at least one run into each set, you can press the "Diff" button in the upper right corner of the "Run" page.
Read more here.
In this section, we'll showcase an example in between two runs. There is an example for diffing tags and timestamps as well further down.
Let's assume you have the following C++ code:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z == 0)
return 1 / z; // report by core.DivideZero
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}Lets use CodeChecker to analyze this file:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
# Alternatively:
CodeChecker log -o compile_command.json -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker analyze -o ./test_report_dir compile_command.jsonUsing the parse command we can see that CodeChecker found and stored
2 reports in ./test_report_dir (showing only a part of the output):
CodeChecker parse ./test_report_dir----==== Checker Statistics ====----
--------------------------------------------------
Checker name | Severity | Number of reports
--------------------------------------------------
core.DivideZero | HIGH | 1
deadcode.DeadStores | LOW | 1
--------------------------------------------------
----=================----
--analyzers=clangsa flag. We chose omit this flag from our examples. Your actual results may also be different depending on the version of your clang binary.
Let's store the results to a running CodeChecker server:
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run" ./test_report_dirNow let's fix one of the previous warnings in the foo function and create a
new function which contains a new warning:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z != 0)
return 1 / z; // no reports
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}
void baz(int *p)
{
if (!p)
*p = 0; // report by core.NullDereference
}Let's analyze the file again into a new directory, and check the results.
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir_updated -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
# Alternatively:
CodeChecker log -o compile_command.json -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker analyze -o ./test_report_dir_updated compile_command.json
CodeChecker parse ./test_report_dir_updated----==== Checker Statistics ====----
---------------------------------------------------
Checker name | Severity | Number of reports
---------------------------------------------------
deadcode.DeadStores | LOW | 1
core.NullDereference | HIGH | 1
---------------------------------------------------
----=================----
Let's store the updated results to a running CodeChecker server:
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run Updated" ./test_report_dir_updatedThe image below shows the set of outstanding reports in both of these runs. In this example, every report is outstanding. You can see that 3 different checkers made a single report each:
- Show outstanding reports that appeared from first analysis to the next (via
--new):- Local-local diff in between
./test_report_dirto./test_report_dir_updated/:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --new
- Remote-remote diff in between
Test RunandTest Run Updated:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --new
- Remote-local or local-remote diff:
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --new CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname "Test Run Updated" --new
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- --------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports --------------------------------------------------- core.NullDereference | HIGH | 1 --------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Local-local diff in between
- Show outstanding reports that disappeared from first analysis to the next (via
--resolved):- Local-local diff in between
./test_report_dirto./test_report_dir_updated/:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --resolved
- Remote-remote diff in between
Test RunandTest Run Updated:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --resolved
- Remote-local or local-remote diff:
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --resolved CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname "Test Run Updated" --resolved
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- ---------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports ---------------------------------------------- core.DivideZero | HIGH | 1 ---------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Local-local diff in between
- Show outstanding reports that remained from first analysis to the next (via
--unresolved):- Local-local diff in between
./test_report_dirto./test_report_dir_updated/:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --unresolved
- Remote-remote diff in between
Test RunandTest Run Updated:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --unresolved
- Remote-local or local-remote diff:
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --unresolved CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname "Test Run Updated" --unresolved
CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_updated/ --unresolved
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- -------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports -------------------------------------------------- deadcode.DeadStores | LOW | 1 -------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Local-local diff in between
Select "Test Run" to be in the "baseline" set by clicking on the left radio button on the right hand side. Select "Test Run Updated" to be in the "newline" set by clicking on the other one. Click on "DIFF" in the upper right corner.
In the middle of the image, we can see the list of oustadning reports that appeared from the baseline to the newline. In the bottom left corner, by clicking on the cogwheel next to "Diff type", you can change diff type:
The list of reports that are no longer outstadning from the baseline to the newline:
The list of reports that are outstanding in both the baseline and the newline sets:
Source code suppressions allow you set the review status of the report. If you change the review status to either false positive or intentional, the report will no longer be outstanding in the context of the run.
Suppose we generate baseline results directory ./test_report_dir and store it with the name Test Run the same way as above. However, for the updated run, modify example.cpp with a source suppression (as well as a new function with a fault that will be reported by deadcode.DeadStores checker):
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z != 0)
return 1 / z; // no reports
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
// codechecker_false_positive [all] suppress all checker results
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}
void baz(int *p)
{
if (!p)
*p = 0; // report by core.NullDereference
}Lets analyze and store this updated file:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir_src_suppressed -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run Src Suppressed" ./test_report_dir_src_suppressedIn this image, showing the set of oustanding reports in each analysis, you can see that while deadcode.DeadStores is still outstanding in ./test_report_dir, it is no longer outstanding in ./test_report_dir_src_suppressed as a result of its false positive review status.
deadcode.DeadStores in the baseline as well. Such reports are abscent from the results of diff, regardless of whether --new, --resolved or --unresolved is used.
- Show outstanding reports that appeared from first analysis to the next (via
--new):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_src_suppressed/ --new
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- --------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports --------------------------------------------------- core.NullDereference | HIGH | 1 --------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that disappeared from first analysis to the next (via
--resolved):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_src_suppressed/ --resolved
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- -------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports -------------------------------------------------- core.DivideZero | HIGH | 1 deadcode.DeadStores | LOW | 1 -------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that remained from first analysis to the next (via
--unresolved):Expected output (no checkers are seen):CodeChecker cmd diff --basename ./test_report_dir --newname ./test_report_dir_src_suppressed/ --unresolved
----======== Summary ========---- --------------------------------------------- Number of processed analyzer result files | 0 Number of analyzer reports | 0 --------------------------------------------- ----=================----
Similarly to source code suppressions, you can set the review status of reports on the GUI as well, which will create a review status rule. Unlike source code suppressions, review status rules set the review status for all reports matching that rule (i.e. having the same hash), regardless whether the rule was created before or after the report was stored, making it easy to mark a report false positive in all runs at the same time. Because these rules are stored on the server, they play no part in local-local diffs as of yet.
Create example.cpp the same way as the previous examples:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z == 0)
return 1 / z; // report by core.DivideZero
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}Analyze and store it to a running CodeChecker server:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run" ./test_report_dirNow, navigate to the the web GUI, and create review status rules. Click on "Test Run".
Click on the first report, emitted by deadcode.DeadStores.
Set its review status to false positive.
Now, modify example.cpp: fix the core.DivideZero error and introduce a null dereference error:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z != 0)
return 1 / z; // no reports
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}
void baz(int *p)
{
if (!p)
*p = 0; // report by core.NullDereference
}Analyze and store:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir_updated -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run Updated" ./test_report_dir_updatedLooking at the web GUI, you can observe that the report emitted by deadcode.DeadStores has a false positive review status, shown by the grey no entry sign 🚫 in the Review Status column. Note that we cleared the review status filter, which won't list false positive reports by default. Below is the "Reports" view for "Test Run":
Below is the "Reports" view for "Test Run Updated":
As a result, this report is not outstanding in either of the runs:
- Show outstanding reports that appeared from first analysis to the next (via
--new):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --new
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- --------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports --------------------------------------------------- core.NullDereference | HIGH | 1 --------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that disappeared from first analysis to the next (via
--resolved):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --resolved
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- ---------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports ---------------------------------------------- core.DivideZero | HIGH | 1 ---------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that remained from first analysis to the next (via
--unresolved):Expected output (no checkers are seen):CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run" --newname "Test Run Updated" --unresolved
----======== Summary ========---- --------------------------------------------- Number of processed analyzer result files | 0 Number of analyzer reports | 0 --------------------------------------------- ----=================----
If a run is continously updated with new analysis results, it can store the past report states of all previous analysis executions. This can be useful to analyze how the reports were fixed, classified to false positives, or introduced over the development timeline. You can filter the analysis results or diff results based on which reports were outstanding before a given timestamp. In the below image, on the web GUI, we diff the reports outstanding before the 1st of January, 2023 in "Test Run" against reports outstanding before the 1st of January, 2023 in "Test Run Updated":
You can also name timestamps which we call tags. In the below image, the cogwheels were clicked next to "Run/Tag Filter", and then next to "Test Run". There, you can select tags to be put into the baseline set:
Comparing runs and comparing tags/timestamps has a subtle difference:
- For runs, we check whether a report is outstanding at the time of the query. This means, as seen in a previous example, if you store a report, and then set a false positive review status rule for it, and then diff this run against another, the report will not be present in the run's outstanding reports set.
- For tags/timestamps, we check whether a report is outstanding before that specific tag/timestamp. This means that if you store a report under
tag1, and then set a false positive review status rule for it, and then diff this tag against another, the report will be present in the tag's outstanding report set. This also implies that we ignore the detection status of the report, as it always describes its current status (which may differ from the timestamp in the query).
To summarize, at timestamp/tag T, a report is outstanding if
- it was detected before or at T,
- its detection status was new, reopened or unresolved at T,
- its review status is unreviewed or confirmed at T.
⛔ Note: You can compare tags through the command line and the web GUI as well. Currently, you can only compare timestamps on the web GUI.
⛔ Note: We are aware of a bug where comparing tags older than the last may yield incorrect results in specific circumstances. It only stores the date when a report was first detected in a run and the date when it was closed. If the report is closed and opened several times, it will only remember the first detection date, and the last close date. So CodeChecker assumes the worst: it regards a report which is on/and/off as it was always there until it is finally fixed. In practice this means, that when you compare the run state at two past tags (after a report detection, but before final fix), a reopened report will be considered as always outstanding after first detection and not appear as new report in the diff. You can read more about this in issue in section "Tag diffs -> Local-Remote -> the footnote with the double asterisk (**)".
Create example.cpp the same way as the previous examples:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z == 0)
return 1 / z; // report by core.DivideZero
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}Analyze and store it to a running CodeChecker server but under tag tag1:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run" ./test_report_dir --tag tag1Now, navigate to the the web GUI, and create review status rules. Click on "Test Run".
Click on the first report, emitted by deadcode.DeadStores.
Set its review status to false positive.
Now, modify example.cpp: fix the core.DivideZero error and introduce a null dereference error:
// example.cpp
int foo(int z)
{
if (z != 0)
return 1 / z; // no reports
return 0;
}
int bar(int x)
{
int y;
y = x % 2; // report by deadcode.DeadStores
return x % 2;
}
void baz(int *p)
{
if (!p)
*p = 0; // report by core.NullDereference
}Analyze and store results under tag tag2. Note that we store under the same run name, but with a different tag:
CodeChecker check -o ./test_report_dir_updated -b "g++ example.cpp -c"
CodeChecker store -n "Test Run" ./test_report_dir_updated --tag tag2Looking at the Run view, when we click on the little arrow to the left of "Test Run", we can see the two analyses under different tags:
Given the chronological order that we first analyzer and stored tag1, and then set a false positive review status rule to deadcode.DeadStores, and then analyzed and stored tag2, the deadcode.DeadStores report will be outstanding in tag1, but not in tag2:
- Show outstanding reports that appeared from first analysis to the next (via
--new):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run":tag1 --newname "Test Run":tag2 --new
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- --------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports --------------------------------------------------- core.NullDereference | HIGH | 1 --------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that disappeared from first analysis to the next (via
--resolved):Expected output:CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run":tag1 --newname "Test Run":tag2 --resolved
----==== Checker Statistics ====---- -------------------------------------------------- Checker name | Severity | Number of reports -------------------------------------------------- core.DivideZero | HIGH | 1 deadcode.DeadStores | LOW | 1 -------------------------------------------------- ----=================---- - Show outstanding reports that remained from first analysis to the next (via
--unresolved):Expected output (no checkers are seen):CodeChecker cmd diff --basename "Test Run":tag1 --newname "Test Run":tag2 --unresolved
----======== Summary ========---- --------------------------------------------- Number of processed analyzer result files | 0 Number of analyzer reports | 0 --------------------------------------------- ----=================----
After clicking the dropdown button next to "Test Run", select tags to be put in the baseline and newline sets. Then, click the "DIFF" button the upper left corner. You can interpret the results the same way as in the first example.
