Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggested charter edits and additions #255
Suggested charter edits and additions #255
Changes from 13 commits
7058d78
edd6cfe
640f41f
7d88693
587cf46
c2cb0b7
c1de621
0b170cf
ffdd071
f20f6a9
a3f9222
39aeb43
7a48818
4e96823
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am comfortable with this change provided technical is a bit better defined. We're working largely with technology companies so I'd argue almost every discussion could be construed as technical in nature because it will absolutely touch on technologies, e.g. stating that it is best practice that a project's ReadMe.md file on GitHub includes contact details for the project maintainers could be construed as a technical discussion.
IANAL, but if one were to take a broad interpretation of this clause, it would mean to me that nearly every communication taking place in TODO Group should be public. This would not be in keeping with current operations, such as the existence of the members only channel on the TODO Slack that is offered as a member benefit; people certainly discuss best practices for their project's GitHub presence in that channel, which is perfectly fine and appropriate.
Is there a way to add more detail to this clause without it becoming unwieldy or overly specific?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technical is everything related to contributing/participating in TODO project repos + meetings related to the activity of each of the repos. For instance:
Maybe we can be more specific on the kind of topics that refers to technical in the playbook, and leave a short sentence like the one suggested here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change:
TBD: Review what is written in communication channels to check if it's well enumerated.