sdk release v2023.10.2

[andrewkmin]

Summary & Motivation

Another day another release!

Main updates:

@turnkey/http

• Consolidated signing routes:
  • We now have a single route, /api/v1/submit/sign_raw_payload for SignRawPayload activities (previously this was split into SignRawPayload and SignRawPayloadV2)
  • This extends to /api/v1/submit/sign_transaction as well. SignTransaction and SignTransactionV2 now have a unified activity: SignTransaction
  • Under the hood, these routes stay largely the same: you can sign raw payloads and transactions with an address (from a wallet account), or a private key ID

@turnkey/viem

• 59dcd2f: Unpin typescript
• da7c960: Bump Viem dependency to fix getAddresses() for LocalAccount

Also, deleted some examples as they've been moved to https://github.com/tkhq/demo-viem-passkeys and https://github.com/tkhq/demo-ethers-passkeys, respectively

How I Tested These Changes

[codesandbox-ci]

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

[r-n-o]

Because we've changed the shape of the params for signing (privateKeyId => signWith) it's technically a breaking change.

Let's mention this in its own line item or section?

### Upgrade notes
* `signRawPayload` and `signTransaction` now expect a `signWith` param instead of `privateKeyId` previously
* `signRawPayload` and `signTransaction` have been updated to expect a new type: `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_RAW_PAYLOAD_V2` and `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_TRANSACTION_V2`, respectively
* if you have policies authorizing `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_RAW_PAYLOAD` or `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_TRANSACTION` specifically, they will need to be updated to authorize `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_RAW_PAYLOAD_V2` and `ACTIVITY_TYPE_SIGN_TRANSACTION_V2` (or better yet, update your policies to allow all signing actions using policy resources and actions, see https://docs.turnkey.com/managing-policies/examples

After writing this up I think a breaking change is warranted because of the policy implications.

[andrewkmin]

👍 makes sense. Think it warrants a major change? b3d31ef I can go either way on this

[r-n-o]

Yeah I think that's safer. I don't think I'd want a major change if it was another activity type; but given this is signing let's make sure people have a chance to look at the notes when they upgrade. Thanks for putting this together!