-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mutating arithmetic for SRow
s
#1659
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5d974b1
Make `scale_row!` follow its docstring
lgoettgens 1c06d6e
Fix a docstring typo
lgoettgens 67da91f
Let `add_scaled_row` coerce the scalar
lgoettgens ea21c55
Add mutating arithmetics for SRow
lgoettgens 9ddf26e
Skip deepcopy in addmul! in case of aliasing
lgoettgens 94b188a
Add `submul!`
lgoettgens 9975911
Add tests
lgoettgens 0057c19
Some fixes (tests run now)
lgoettgens c5fb659
Comment out tests
lgoettgens ba27dd8
Adapt to AA changes
lgoettgens 9c8d5cd
Bump AbstractAlgebra compat
lgoettgens File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Orthogonal to this PR, but: Since you now handle
b==0
at the start, theiszero(a.values[i])
check above the fold can only returntrue
if the coefficient ring is not a domain. So it could be strengthened to something like!is_domain_type(T) && iszero(a.values[i])
.Since
is_domain_type
is a trait depending only onT
, the compiler can eliminate theis_domain_type(T)
check -- if it returnstrue
it can elide theif
block, and if it isfalse
we the same code we have currently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But this can easily wait for a follow-up PR. (Also
scale_row!
andscale_row_right!
could be merged)