Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

i18n - pulling from tx #731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

i18n - pulling from tx #731

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

stejskalleos
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines +904 to +908
msgid "Update Capsules on given hosts"
msgstr ""

#: ../lib/foreman_ansible/remote_execution.rb:46
msgid "Update Capsules on given Capsule server hosts"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's really poor practice to include downstream terminology into upstream, but it was already there so not blocking for this PR.

@adamruzicka I see you added it in c1ebb2c but should this have been added to foreman_theme_satellite?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not only terminology, the whole thing is downstream specific without any sensible upstream equivalent.

While it would make sense putting downstream things into the downstream plugin, including random pieces of functionality in a branding plugin doesn't feel exactly great either.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This whole file is messed up in terms of encoding. Looks like we missed that in 3dace0a.

Right now it's needed to update the .pot file, but something we absolutely need to fix before the next release.

@ekohl
Copy link
Member

ekohl commented Aug 21, 2024

Test failures are probably unrelated

@ekohl ekohl merged commit 343db80 into theforeman:master Sep 2, 2024
22 of 27 checks passed
@ekohl ekohl mentioned this pull request Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants