Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency flutter_lints to v5 #20

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 25, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
flutter_lints (source) dev_dependencies major ^4.0.0 -> ^5.0.0

Release Notes

flutter/packages (flutter_lints)

v5.0.0

Compare Source

  • Updates package:lints dependency to version 5.0.0, with the following changes:
    • adds invalid_runtime_check_with_js_interop_types
    • adds unnecessary_library_name
    • removes avoid_null_checks_in_equality_operators
  • Removes the following lints (see https://github.com/dart-lang/lints/issues/205):
    • prefer_const_constructors
    • prefer_const_declarations
    • prefer_const_literals_to_create_immutables
  • Updates minimum supported SDK version to Flutter 3.24/Dart 3.5.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/flutter_lints-5.x branch from 0f74a2b to 496c9ac Compare October 2, 2024 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants