Releases #24
Comments
|
I was thinking we'd do all three: Windows, macOS, and Linux. I've built it for macOS and Windows so far. There are some quirks with the different platforms. I'll take care of packaging and signing. I was thinking we'd do a standard exe not UWP. |
|
I think we should do both - all possible platforms. We could also be able to upload our app to the windows store |
|
Windows store will accept traditional exe or msi apps on Windows 11 |
|
We could do windows store and mac app store, but I think we should worry about that later. Right now we should focus on getting the first version out on our website. Then we can start working on other distribution avenues. |
|
I think windows apps are cleaner and easier to install rather than downloading from github and copying a bunch of files from all over the place. |
|
@ethanaobrien is this you? |
|
I'm not @ethanaobrien , I can't really do Javascript and you guys are here doing full web servers |
|
Yeah, thats not me
|
|
@caasi-e I saw you created your account less than an hour before posting here. How did you find this project, and why do you follow @ethanaobrien ? |
|
I've been using/testing out things that @ethanaobrien has recommended for a while, I made an account today to leave the one comment, and I don't plan to make a habit out of commentating. I follow Ethan because he's a personal friend, good-luck on your project |
We'll package it up into an installer program, like most programs do. Users won't have to manually build or install it. |
|
@terreng Once we do releases, would I be able to package and release a windows store app? I would be willing to pay $20 to create the account. If you don't really care I would like to be in change of just keeping it updated and all the stuff there |
|
I think we can create a shared account and allow us to both publish releases. But please, let me have a chance to look into packaging and publishing options for all three platforms before we do anything. I'm going to keep working on the new UI for now, and we can come back to this once it's time to release. Sound like a plan? |
|
Awesome!
|
|
@terreng I'm going to go ahead and say what I've been thinking and then you can tell me what you think I think we need to put this app out there, In every place we can. The more places/platforms we have it available on, the more it will spread, the larger chance that someone will write one of those articles on it. I suggest we publish to the microsoft store, and (I'm not familiar with it at all) flatpack. If we could it would be cool if we could even put it in the linux repositories. |
|
We can publish this a variety of places once it's ready for release. 👍 |
|
@terreng Do you have a macOS you can use to compile .dmg packages? https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MmJYRceI1g1ZLNvANZ3AlnG9KB8GF3_h?usp=sharing |
|
Yeah, I have both macOS and Windows |
|
@ethanaobrien What platforms do you have to test on? I have both macOS and Windows. Do you have a Linux machine? Windows 7? 10? Let me know. |
|
@terreng |
|
Okay great. I can fine tune for macOS and Windows a bit. And you can test on Windows and Linux. |
|
@terreng Can we delete the |
The folder should be excluded from packaging, not deleted. |
|
@ethanaobrien I assume the installer will automatically update a previously installed version? |
I would assume so, but not sure |
Could you test to find out? I would assume, just want to check. By the way, I'm going to route all downloads from the website to the GitHub releases download URL. The download stats are publicly available through the GitHub API. So once the new version is released, you should send people the website/GitHub and not a Google Drive link. I do not want the program to have any kind of analytics/telemetry, other than update checking. |
|
I looked in to code signing, and found that it might not be as straightforward as I thought for an open source project. Code signing and macOS App Store would be $99 from Apple. Looks like Microsoft Store is $19 but also requires us to purchase a code signing cert separately. Looks like Microsoft Store allows any publisher name, but Apple requires a legal name or registered business. I also looked at some alternative app stores like Setapp. I've concluded that we should just publish an unsigned app on our website for now. On Windows, this means users have to click past the UAC prompt. macOS doesn't like users installing unsigned apps either. So we'll need to provide instructions on the website for how to install on both OSes. Let's look in to proper signing and further distribution after our initial release. I'm wondering if we might find an organization that provides signing / distribution for open source apps. |
|
@ethanaobrien Let's release this next month. Sound like a plan? |
|
Yeah, I get back from vacation in 2 days should be able to fix the https thing then |
|
I went ahead and opened and issue in the electron forge repository seeing if there was a way to pack all the files, apparently this is implemented! |
|
I just switched from electron-forge to electron-builder, which uses asar by default. |
|
Yeah, I saw, sounds good. Do you have an eta of when we can release? |
I'm currently working on building. So very soon. |
|
Are we going to put #83 in the first release? We could at least add it to the documentation and have the config needed to be edited manually (or just document it later and release it as a "hidden" feature?) |
|
I'm not going to include it in the initial release. I have some ideas about it that I will share with you soon. |
|
@ethanaobrien Good news. It turns out that you actually don't need to sign appx packages for the Microsoft store. I'm working on the submission for the MS store, hopefully it goes through / gets accepted. The direct download from the website / GitHub still won't be signed, but it's less of an issue. |
|
Awesome! Could you let me know when/if it gets approved? |
Of course! I'll send the link, and put it on the website. |
|
@ethanaobrien Good news! Simple Web Server is officially on the Microsoft Store. At the moment, it comes up first when you search "web server". Here's the link: https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/simple-web-server/9PC6682RJCDD I noticed that the app icon doesn't look great in a few places on Windows, either low resolution or with a gray border. I'll look in to how to fix that. I probably just need to add more icon sizes for the appx package.
Next up is the macOS App Store... |
|
Awesome! |
|
@terreng could you remind me why we aren't distributing pre built files for Linux distributions? |
|
IIRC I just couldn't get the build to work for some reason. That's it, it could be really simple thing. #89 |
|
@terreng 2 things. While simple web server is technically unsupported on chromeos, do we want to note that on any modern chromebook (since chrome 84) has a linux console that you can enable, and simple web server installs and runs quite perfectly in it? and it works and operates as it would on a normal debian computer. Second thing, if you think its worth it, it wouldnt be difficult to host a debian repository to update the server debian image from, instead of having to re-download and install it manually every time. For an example of how this would look you can see https://ethanthesleepy.one/debian/, and if youd be interested in it I could tell you more. |
Incredible! That's fantastic. I had no idea Chromebooks could do that! (They probably couldn't back when I used them in middle school) Does everything work okay? Specifically I'm wondering if it can access the filesystem and if the file picker works. What about options like "Keep running when closed"? I don't have a Chromebook to test with, so it would be great if you could try everything out and see if everything works or not. If it all works or all mostly works, then can you draft some instructions on how to install it? It would be great if you could take some screenshots of how to enable the Linux console and install the app. Thanks again for bumping #89 a few weeks ago. Very cool that finishing that also gave us ChromeOS support for free.
I just opened #169 to solve this problem. I used By the way, I just enabled GitHub Sponsors for my account and this repository. |
With the way chromeos works, the linux container has its own file system. You can go into the files app, right click on "share with linux" and it will be mounted under
Just tested, yes and no. The app runs when closed, but does not seem to want to re-appear when clicked, but the server is still on. This is very likely a chromeos security thing. I just tested this in a debian vm and was incorrect, this seems to be an issue with linux as a whole. This is not chromeos specific. Im sure you already know, but the debian app doesnt correctly display the app image.
Yeah, thats correct. I was incorrect about that, sorry about that.
Thats really nice!
I would say in the long run, a simple debian repo would just be a convenience for debian (and ubuntu?) users, to update from the built-in package manager.
That is definitely good, youre the one whos paid for the domain/mac store/microsoft store/etc, and thank you so much for that. |
This would be something to mention in the instructions. I think we should create a new page on the website just for explaining how to use it on Chrome OS. |
|
Sounds good, I'll try to do this when I get the chance |
What all platforms are we going to release this on?
I've been doing some testing and we should be able to do everything from linux to macos to windows store apps.
I've been running into a lot of trouble packaging the appx. I packaged it into the appx but I cannot figure out how to sign it.
Your thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: