Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow passing optional TensixSoftResetOptions to assert risc reset at core API #308

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

abhullar-tt
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

#307

Description

Mirror of #292 so we can assert risc reset back to initial state.

List of the changes

Added an optional parameter to assert_risc_reset_at_core API

Testing

Expanded deassert risc reset at core to go through assert sequences as well

API Changes

This PR has non-breaking API changes

@abhullar-tt abhullar-tt requested a review from broskoTT November 15, 2024 20:04
Copy link
Contributor

@broskoTT broskoTT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure why isn't the test passing on E300... Please fix before merging, unless this change is time critical.

@abhullar-tt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why isn't the test passing on E300... Please fix before merging, unless this change is time critical.

Yes I will investigate that

tests/api/test_chip.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abhullar-tt abhullar-tt force-pushed the abhullar/assert-reset branch 2 times, most recently from e306ed0 to a2591d7 Compare December 28, 2024 03:43
@abhullar-tt abhullar-tt force-pushed the abhullar/assert-reset branch from a2591d7 to 8c5aa30 Compare December 28, 2024 03:44
@abhullar-tt abhullar-tt merged commit 8c5aa30 into main Dec 28, 2024
19 checks passed
@abhullar-tt abhullar-tt deleted the abhullar/assert-reset branch December 28, 2024 05:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants