Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a case insensitive plan modifier for the namespace search attribute type field #171

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

anekkanti
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@anekkanti anekkanti marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 22:41
@anekkanti anekkanti requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2024 22:41
Description: "The type of the search attribute. Must be one of `bool`, `datetime`, `double`, `int`, `keyword`, or `text`. (case-insensitive)",
Required: true,
CustomType: internaltypes.CaseInsensitiveStringType{},
Description: "The type of the search attribute. Must be one of `bool`, `datetime`, `double`, `int`, `keyword`, or `text`. (case-insensitive)",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this missing the keyword list option?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, thanks!
We added support for keyword_list relatively recently.
Pushed an update.

@anekkanti anekkanti merged commit 0b8f167 into main Nov 12, 2024
5 checks passed
@anekkanti anekkanti deleted the abhinav/useCaseInsensitivePlanModifierForSAs branch November 12, 2024 18:51
@anekkanti anekkanti restored the abhinav/useCaseInsensitivePlanModifierForSAs branch November 12, 2024 18:51
@anekkanti anekkanti deleted the abhinav/useCaseInsensitivePlanModifierForSAs branch November 12, 2024 18:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlacefie jlacefie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with 1 nit for the Description language to make it a little more clear

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants