Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[TEP-0048] Task Results without Results
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
This TEP is updated with the new proposed solution where we now specify
the default value for results at the time where they are consumed.

Signed-off-by: vinamra28 <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
vinamra28 committed Feb 13, 2023
1 parent 8bd4cb3 commit c9e04e2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 179 additions and 42 deletions.
219 changes: 178 additions & 41 deletions teps/0048-task-results-without-results.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,9 +4,10 @@ authors:
- "@pritidesai"
- "@jerop"
- "@vinamra28"
- "@bobcatfish"
creation-date: 2020-10-20
last-updated: 2022-08-09
status: implementable
last-updated: 2023-02-13
status: proposed
---

# TEP-0048: Task Results without Results
Expand All @@ -27,6 +28,8 @@ status: implementable
- [<code>Task</code> claiming to produce <code>Result</code> fails if it doesn't produces](#-claiming-to-produce--fails-if-it-doesnt-produces)
- [Test Plan](#test-plan)
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
- [Specifying Default Value during Runtime](#specifying-default-value-during-runtime)
- [Specifying Default Value at the time of Authoring the Task](#specifying-default-value-at-the-time-of-authoring-the-task)
- [Declaring Results as Optional](#declaring-results-as-optional)
- [Future Work](#future-work)
- [References](#references)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -81,9 +84,9 @@ a missing task result. There are many reasons for a missing task result:
* a `task` producing task result failed, no result available
* a `task` producing result was skipped/disabled and no result generated
* a `task` producing result did not generate that result even without any failure. We have a
[bug report](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3497) open to declare
[bug report][tektoncd/pipeline#3497] open to declare
such a task as failure. This reason might not hold true after issue
[#3497]((https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3497)) is fixed.
[#3497][tektoncd/pipeline#3497] is fixed.

Here are the major motivations for `pipeline` authors to design their pipelines with the missing task results:

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -426,47 +429,77 @@ will fix the `Pipeline`.

## Proposal

We propose adding an optional field - `default` - to the `Result` specification in `Task`.
We propose adding default value at the place where variable replacement
happens and let consumer decide which value it wants to pick up. For example:

```yaml
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1beta1
kind: Task
metadata:
name: task
spec:
results:
- name: merge_status
description: whether to rebase or squash
type: string
default: rebase
- name: branches
description: branches in the repository
type: array
default:
- main
- v1alpha1
- v1beta1
- v1
- name: images
type: object
properties:
node:
type: string
default: "node:latest"
gcloud:
type: string
default: "gcloud:latest"
steps:
...
results:
- name: merge_status
description: whether to rebase or squash
type: string
- name: branches
description: branches in the repository
type: array
- name: images
type: object
properties:
node:
type: string
gcloud:
type: string
---
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1beta1
kind: Pipeline
metadata:
name: pipeline-with-defaults
spec:
tasks:
- name: taskA
onError: continue
taskRef:
name: task
results:
- name: merge_status
default: squash
- name: taskB
runAfter:
- "taskA"
taskRef:
name: demo-task
params:
- name: param1
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.merge_status || "foobar")
- name: param2
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.branches || [foo, bar, baz])
- name: param3
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.images || {node="foo", gcloud="bar"})
- name: taskC
runAfter:
- "taskA"
taskRef:
name: demo-task
params:
- name: param1
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.merge_status)
- name: param2
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.branches || [foo, bar, baz])
- name: param3
value: $(tasks.taskA.results.images || {node="foo", gcloud="bar"})
...
```


Adding a default value to `Results` is optional; validation of a `Task` doesn't
fail if the default value isn't provided.

Adding a default value to a `Result` will guarantee that it will hold a value even
if the `Task` fails to produce it. If a `Task` does not produce a `Result` that does not
have a default value, then the `Task` should fail - see [tektoncd/pipeline#3497](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3497) for further details.
If the `Task` doesn't produces any result then it should fail. In order to
continue with the execution of `Pipeline`, `onError: continue` should be added
in the `PipelineTask` which we anticipate to fail and subsequent `Tasks`
which are consuming the results produced by the previous `Task` should have a
default value specified.

The proposed solution can be used to solve the above use cases as follows:

Expand All @@ -491,7 +524,7 @@ spec:
- name: build-image
runAfter: [ "check-pr-content" ]
when:
- input: "$(tasks.check-pr-content.results.image-change)"
- input: "$(tasks.check-pr-content.results.image-change || no)"
operator: in
values: ["yes"]
taskRef:
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -554,9 +587,9 @@ spec:
runAfter: [ "build-image" ]
params:
- name: trusted-image-name
value: "$(tasks.build-trusted.results.image)"
value: "$(tasks.build-trusted.results.image || "trusted")"
- name: untrusted-image-name
value: "$(tasks.build-untrusted.results.image)"
value: "$(tasks.build-untrusted.results.image || "untrusted")"
taskRef:
name: propagate-image-name
# pipeline result
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -586,7 +619,6 @@ spec:
results:
- name: check
description: The result of the check, "passed" or "failed"
default: "passed"
steps:
- name: check-name
image: alpine
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -631,6 +663,7 @@ spec:
description: The pullRequestNumber
tasks:
- name: check-name-match
onError: continue
taskRef:
name: check-name-matches
params:
Expand All @@ -640,7 +673,7 @@ spec:
value: $(params.checkName)
- name: clone-repo
when:
- input: $(tasks.check-name-match.results.check)
- input: $(tasks.check-name-match.results.check || "failed")
operator: in
values: ["passed"]
taskRef:
Expand All @@ -655,8 +688,12 @@ spec:
...
```

In the above example, if the value of parameter `checkName` is not passed,
the `Task` is failed but in order to continue the execution of the `Pipeline`,
we use the `onError: continue` flag and

In the above example, even if the value of parameter `checkName` is not passed,
default value of `Result` will be produced `passed` and Pipeline's execution will
default value of `Result` will be produced `f` and Pipeline's execution will
be continued. The only case when the execution of `Pipeline` is stopped when
the wrong value of parameter `checkName` is passed.

Expand All @@ -670,6 +707,103 @@ Having default results defined in check-name-matches Task will fix the Pipeline.

## Alternatives

### Specifying Default Value during Runtime

Adding an optional field - `default` for a `Result` which can be specified
during runtime, i.e., in `TaskRun` or `Pipeline` for a `Task` or in `PipelineRun` for a `Pipeline`.

```yaml
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1beta1
kind: Task
metadata:
name: task
spec:
results:
- name: merge_status
description: whether to rebase or squash
type: string
- name: branches
description: branches in the repository
type: array
- name: images
type: object
properties:
node:
type: string
gcloud:
type: string
steps:
...
---
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1beta1
kind: TaskRun
metadata:
name: task
spec:
taskRef:
name: task
results:
- name: merge_status
default: rebase
...
```

Passing the default value for the `Result` at runtime is optional; validation
of `TaskRun` or `Pipeline` or `PipelineRun` doesn't fail if the value isn't provided.

Adding a default value to `Results` is optional; validation of a `Task` doesn't
fail if the default value isn't provided.

Adding a default value to a `Result` will guarantee that it will hold a value even
if the `Task` fails to produce it. If a `Task` does not produce a `Result` that does not
have a default value, then the `Task` should fail - see [tektoncd/pipeline#3497][tektoncd/pipeline#3497] for further details.

Values specified in `TaskRun` or `Pipeline` should be overwritten by declaring
`Task` itself, if `Task` declares a `Result` then it should be considered as
the final value for that result.

### Specifying Default Value at the time of Authoring the Task

Allow `Results` to declare an optional field as `default`. When a `Task` fails to
produce a `Result` but has a default value specified, then the `Task` does not fail. When a `Task` fails
to produce a `Result` that doesn't have any default value specified, then then the `Task` will fail.

```yaml
apiVersion: tekton.dev/v1beta1
kind: Task
metadata:
name: task
spec:
results:
- name: merge_status
description: whether to rebase or squash
type: string
default: "rebase"
- name: branches
description: branches in the repository
type: array
default:
- "foo"
- "bar"
- name: images
type: object
properties:
node:
type: string
gcloud:
type: string
default:
node: "16"
gcloud: "true"
steps:
...
```

This solution only solves the issue of `Tasks` not failing when they
don't produce `Results` as discussed in [tektoncd/pipeline#3497][tektoncd/pipeline#3497].
However, it does not addressed the use case where an user can
have different default values at runtime based on their `Pipeline`.

### Declaring Results as Optional

Allow `Results` to declare an optional field as `optional`. When a `Task` fails to
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -704,7 +838,7 @@ spec:
```

However, this solution only solves the issue of `Tasks` not failing when they don't
produce `Results` as discussed in [tektoncd/pipeline#3497](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3497).
produce `Results` as discussed in [tektoncd/pipeline#3497][tektoncd/pipeline#3497].
It does not address the use cases for providing default `Results` that can be consumed in subsequent `Tasks`.


Expand All @@ -721,3 +855,6 @@ Determine if we need default `Results` declared at runtime in the future, and ho
* [Issue reported - "when" expressions do not match user expectations](https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3345)

* [Accessing Execution status of any DAG task from finally](https://github.com/tektoncd/community/blob/master/teps/0028-task-execution-status-at-runtime.md)


[tektoncd/pipeline#3497]: https://github.com/tektoncd/pipeline/issues/3497
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion teps/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ This is the complete list of Tekton TEPs:
|[TEP-0045](0045-whenexpressions-in-finally-tasks.md) | WhenExpressions in Finally Tasks | implemented | 2021-06-03 |
|[TEP-0046](0046-finallytask-execution-post-timeout.md) | Finally tasks execution post pipelinerun timeout | implemented | 2021-12-14 |
|[TEP-0047](0047-pipeline-task-display-name.md) | Pipeline Task Display Name | implementable | 2022-01-04 |
|[TEP-0048](0048-task-results-without-results.md) | Task Results without Results | implementable | 2022-08-09 |
|[TEP-0048](0048-task-results-without-results.md) | Task Results without Results | proposed | 2022-02-13 |
|[TEP-0049](0049-aggregate-status-of-dag-tasks.md) | Aggregate Status of DAG Tasks | implemented | 2021-06-03 |
|[TEP-0050](0050-ignore-task-failures.md) | Ignore Task Failures | implementable | 2022-09-16 |
|[TEP-0051](0051-ppc64le-architecture-support.md) | ppc64le Support | proposed | 2021-01-28 |
Expand Down

0 comments on commit c9e04e2

Please sign in to comment.