Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🎉 2차 QA 스타일 수정 완료 #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

🎉 2차 QA 스타일 수정 완료 #134

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023

Conversation

juyeon-park
Copy link
Contributor

- 목적

관련 티켓 번호: 358


- 주요 변경 사항

  • 상세정보페이지 뒤로가기 버튼 추가
  • 상세정보페이지 프로필&닉네임 여백 변경
  • 메인 페이지 최근 거래성사내역 여백 추가
  • tradeArea 빈값으로 들어올 경우 미입력으로 보이게 변경

기타 사항 (선택)


- 스크린샷 (선택)

@juyeon-park juyeon-park self-assigned this Nov 28, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@doggopawer doggopawer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CSS 수정, 및 nullable 관련 처리 군요. 확인했습니다.

Comment on lines 24 to 29
const cardData = data?.data

return (
<main className="flex-col min-h-screen bg-background-color">
{cardData && (
<>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

데이터가 없는 경우에 대한 처리라면 isEmpty 라는 변수명이 더 읽기 좋을 것 같습니다.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

흠 데이터가 없는 경우라기보다는 cardData가 무조건 있을때만 보이게 논리연산자를 통해 작성한 것이라 가독성에는 큰 문제가 없다고 생각하는데 변경하지 않아도 괜찮을까요??

Copy link
Collaborator

@oaoong oaoong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@juyeon-park juyeon-park merged commit 2d67526 into develop Nov 29, 2023
2 checks passed
@juyeon-park juyeon-park deleted the NABI-358 branch November 29, 2023 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants