Fixes spelling errors in the codebase

[Sonu0305]

📝 Description

Type: 🪲 bugfix | 📝 documentation

renamed spelling tarids -> tardis

Closes #2937

📌 Resources

Examples, notebooks, and links to useful references.

🚦 Testing

How did you test these changes?

• Testing pipeline
• Other method (describe)
• My changes can't be tested (explain why)

☑️ Checklist

• I requested two reviewers for this pull request
• I updated the documentation according to my changes
• I built the documentation by applying the build_docs label

Note: If you are not allowed to perform any of these actions, ping (@) a contributor.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran ruff on the latest commit (d8178ac).
Here are the outputs produced.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.
Summarised output:

1	ANN204	[ ] Missing return type annotation for special method `__getitem__`
1	I001  	[*] Import block is un-sorted or un-formatted
1	E999  	[ ] SyntaxError: Expected a statement
1	D202  	[*] No blank lines allowed after function docstring (found 1)
1	D406  	[*] Section name should end with a newline ("Returns")
1	D407  	[*] Missing dashed underline after section ("Returns")

Complete output(might be large):

docs/contributing/development/benchmarks.rst:1:1: E999 SyntaxError: Expected a statement
tardis/opacities/macro_atom/macroatom_state.py:1:1: I001 [*] Import block is un-sorted or un-formatted
tardis/opacities/opacity_state.py:210:9: ANN204 Missing return type annotation for special method `__getitem__`
tardis/opacities/opacity_state.py:216:9: D407 [*] Missing dashed underline after section ("Returns")
tardis/opacities/opacity_state.py:216:9: D406 [*] Section name should end with a newline ("Returns")
tardis/opacities/opacity_state.py:251:5: D202 [*] No blank lines allowed after function docstring (found 1)
Found 6 errors.
[*] 4 fixable with the `--fix` option.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*

Hi, human.

The docs workflow has failed ❌

Click here to see the build log.

[tardis-bot]

*beep* *bop*
Hi human,
I ran benchmarks as you asked comparing master (2a06fdf) and the latest commit (d8178ac).
Here are the logs produced by ASV.
Results can also be downloaded as artifacts here.

Significantly changed benchmarks:

All benchmarks:

Benchmarks that have stayed the same:

| Change   | Before [5e2d0bb3] <master>   | After [d8178ac6]    | Ratio   | Benchmark (Parameter)                                                                                                               |
|----------|------------------------------|---------------------|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          | 43.2±30μs                    | 62.9±30μs           | ~1.46   | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_scatter                                          |
|          | 1.47±0.6μs                   | 1.70±0.4μs          | ~1.16   | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_line                    |
|          | 7.29±2μs                     | 8.19±2μs            | ~1.12   | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_volley                                    |
|          | 4.71±0.2ms                   | 3.86±0.01ms         | ~0.82   | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('macroatom')                                   |
|          | 632±200ns                    | 501±200ns           | ~0.79   | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_compton_opacity_calculation                                      |
|          | 57.7±20μs                    | 26.1±7μs            | ~0.45   | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_last_interaction_tracker_list |
|          | 42.9±30μs                    | 46.8±30μs           | 1.09    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_line_emission                                         |
|          | 3.38±0.5μs                   | 3.64±6μs            | 1.08    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_bad_vpacket                                       |
|          | 3.34±0.5μs                   | 3.57±0.4μs          | 1.07    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket_within_shell                              |
|          | 3.15±0.02ms                  | 3.32±0.01ms         | 1.05    | opacities_opacity_state.BenchmarkOpacitiesOpacityState.time_opacity_state_initialize('scatter')                                     |
|          | 204±0.3ns                    | 210±0.6ns           | 1.03    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_intensity_black_body                                       |
|          | 2.82±0.4ms                   | 2.88±0.4ms          | 1.02    | transport_montecarlo_single_packet_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloSinglePacketLoop.time_single_packet_loop                        |
|          | 541±200ns                    | 541±200ns           | 1.00    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_photoabsorption_opacity_calculation                              |
|          | 2.10±0m                      | 2.10±0m             | 1.00    | spectrum_formal_integral.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloFormalIntegral.time_FormalIntegrator_functions                                 |
|          | 40.3±0.05s                   | 39.6±0.03s          | 0.98    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis                                                                                       |
|          | 1.07±0m                      | 1.05±0m             | 0.98    | run_tardis.BenchmarkRunTardis.time_run_tardis_rpacket_tracking                                                                      |
|          | 1.20±0μs                     | 1.17±0μs            | 0.98    | transport_geometry_calculate_distances.BenchmarkTransportGeometryCalculateDistances.time_calculate_distance_boundary                |
|          | 66.8±0.5ms                   | 65.8±0.05ms         | 0.98    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_rpacket_trackers_to_dataframe                  |
|          | 736±0.8ns                    | 716±0.7ns           | 0.97    | transport_montecarlo_interaction.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloInteraction.time_thomson_scatter                                       |
|          | 2.39±2μs                     | 2.28±2μs            | 0.95    | transport_montecarlo_estimators_radfield_estimator_calcs.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaPacket.time_update_line_estimators       |
|          | 1.89±0.03ms                  | 1.79±0.03ms         | 0.95    | transport_montecarlo_main_loop.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloMontecarloMainLoop.time_montecarlo_main_loop                             |
|          | 40.6±0.04μs                  | 38.6±0.1μs          | 0.95    | transport_montecarlo_packet_trackers.BenchmarkTransportMontecarloPacketTrackers.time_generate_rpacket_tracker_list                  |
|          | 7.01±0.6μs                   | 6.59±1μs            | 0.94    | transport_montecarlo_vpacket.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaVpacket.time_trace_vpacket                                           |
|          | 551±100ns                    | 511±200ns           | 0.93    | opacities_opacity.BenchmarkMontecarloMontecarloNumbaOpacities.time_pair_creation_opacity_calculation                                |

If you want to see the graph of the results, you can check it here

[Sonu0305]

Hi @atharva-2001 @andrewfullard @jvshields ,
Could you please review when you have a chance, Thank You.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.03%. Comparing base (2a06fdf) to head (d8178ac).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2938      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.39%   70.03%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         222      222              
  Lines       16157    16157              
==========================================
- Hits        11373    11316      -57     
- Misses       4784     4841      +57     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Sonu0305]

Hi @atharva-2001 @andrewfullard @jvshields @KasukabeDefenceForce ,
Could you please review when you have a chance, Thank You.