-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shamir's secret sharing algorithm #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update involves the addition of Shamir's Secret Sharing scheme implementation in Rust, featuring a new file named Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
shamir-secret-sharing/Cargo.toml
is excluded by!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (1)
- shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs (1)
19-19
: Clarify the comment regarding the range of random values for the coefficients. The current implementation does not explicitly restrict values to(0, threshold)
. Consider specifying the actual range used or adjusting the implementation to match the described range.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by!**/*.toml
polynomial/Cargo.toml
is excluded by!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (1)
- polynomial/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
polynomial/src/lib.rs (2)
7-8
: LGTM! The addition ofnalgebra
and the use of traits fromnum_traits
are appropriate for the operations required in this implementation.
106-109
: LGTM! Theeval
method is correctly implemented for evaluating polynomials across different representations.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/ci.yaml (1 hunks)
- polynomial/src/lib.rs (3 hunks)
- shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs
Additional comments not posted (5)
.github/workflows/ci.yaml (1)
55-56
: Consider re-enabling the beta and nightly Rust versions in the CI configuration or provide a rationale for their exclusion. Testing against these versions can help catch compatibility issues with future Rust versions early.polynomial/src/lib.rs (4)
7-7
: LGTM! The addition ofnalgebra
supports the mathematical operations required by the implementation.
68-76
: LGTM! Thegenerate_powers
method is implemented correctly and efficiently.
86-116
: LGTM! Thenew_from_evals
method correctly generates a polynomial from evaluation points, and the previous issue regarding the return type has been addressed.
64-67
: LGTM! The modifications to constraints forPolynomial<T>
implementation are necessary and ensure type safety and correctness of operations.Also applies to: 80-81, 120-121
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- shamir-secret-sharing/src/lib.rs
Summary by CodeRabbit