You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
jmartin-sul
changed the title
figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
[HOLD] figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
Dec 9, 2019
i think we still want this, and iirc, the reason we disabled the codes was because the error messages would exceed some field length or other when workflow service's database was still in oracle (it was later migrated to postgres).
removing [HOLD]
jmartin-sul
changed the title
[HOLD] figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
Nov 5, 2022
The easiest way to test this is probably to just deploy the potential fix to QA or stage, and in rails console there, run: PreservedObject.find_each(&:audit_moab_version_replication!).
that'll kick off replication for all objects. you may want to double-check, but as of a few days ago, each had about 39k druids, which is not a terribly huge amount of objects on which to run replication audit. those environments are a bit of a mess, so the only downside is that those envs are a mess, so a lot of errors will probably be reported.
actually, now that i think about it, we might want to wait for #1986 to be finished before doing this.
ok, marking blocked.
jmartin-sul
changed the title
figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
[BLOCKED by #1986] figure out how to re-enable zip part audit codes in AuditResults::WORKFLOW_REPORT_CODES
Nov 5, 2022
see
preservation_catalog/app/services/reporters/audit_workflow_reporter.rb
Lines 30 to 36 in 9c4eb15
this way, replication errors are surfaced in argo the same way as other errors are, and block further versioning of problematic druids.
i wasn't sure whether to count this as a bug, or tech debt, so i counted it as both 😆
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: