[Python] Add support for some new syntax in Python 3.8 #2006
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
New in Python 3.8. Upstream change: python/cpython@9a4135e
Added in Python 3.8 via https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0570/.
|
Looks good, thanks! |
mitranim
pushed a commit
to mitranim/Packages
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2022
* [Python] Support `=` debug indicator in f-strings New in Python 3.8. Upstream change: python/cpython@9a4135e * [Python] Support "positional args only" operator Added in Python 3.8 via https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0570/.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Python 3.8 will include the following syntax changes:
f'{expr=}'expands to the text of the expression, an equal sign, then the repr of the evaluated expression (https://bugs.python.org/issue36817)I skipped assignment expressions for now because they are a tad bit more involved and ideally I'd like to see some consensus on #1842 regarding the scope names I should use for the identifiers that are assigned to. Because the assignments are inline, it would seem useful for those to be highlighted differently compared to normal variable usages.
Anyway, here are the small changes I've done so far.
The final release is scheduled for 2019-10-21.