Basic Modifications to IP Asset Registry register

[jdubpark]

• Remove check for IERC721 interface support since we check forIERC721Metadata interface support, which inherits IERC721.
• Remove chainId from naming since contracts and offchain apps can already know the chain an IP is on.

[kingster-will]

Remove chainId from naming since contracts and offchain apps can already know the chain an IP is on.

For cross-chain scenarios, the offchain app might NOT be able to directly to know the original chain of an IP.

[jdubpark]

For cross-chain scenarios, the offchain app might NOT be able to directly to know the original chain of an IP.

Using onchain name as a reference is not ideal as the underlying NFTs can be multi-chain as well, such as y00ts or DeGods migrating chains.

I agree that providing clarity is nice but I don't see IP's name as a good place for clarity.

[jdubpark]

Will just keep Chain ID for potential offchain usage, but at the cost of gas overhead to store extra string.

[LeoHChen]

Will just keep Chain ID for potential offchain usage, but at the cost of gas overhead to store extra string.

maybe remove the id from the name for local chain registration, and add id for cross-chain registration?

but this will create inconsistency though. makes it harder to consume by dapp.