Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formal preprocessed columns in expressions. #923

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2024

Conversation

Alon-Ti
Copy link
Contributor

@Alon-Ti Alon-Ti commented Dec 5, 2024

No description provided.

@reviewable-StarkWare
Copy link

This change is Reviewable

@Alon-Ti Alon-Ti requested a review from andrewmilson December 5, 2024 14:33
@Alon-Ti Alon-Ti marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 14:33
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alon-Ti commented Dec 5, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.42%. Comparing base (76af3c6) to head (53e8a1a).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...r/src/constraint_framework/preprocessed_columns.rs 66.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #923      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.43%   91.42%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          94       94              
  Lines       13686    13695       +9     
  Branches    13686    13695       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        12514    12521       +7     
- Misses       1057     1059       +2     
  Partials      115      115              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.

Benchmark suite Current: 53e8a1a Previous: cd8b37b Ratio
merkle throughput/simd merkle 29588458 ns/iter (± 261863) 13712527 ns/iter (± 579195) 2.16

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

CC: @shaharsamocha7

@Alon-Ti Alon-Ti mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewmilson andrewmilson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: 0 of 3 files reviewed, all discussions resolved

Copy link
Contributor Author

Alon-Ti commented Dec 8, 2024

Merge activity

  • Dec 8, 9:08 AM EST: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • Dec 8, 9:08 AM EST: A user merged this pull request with Graphite.

@Alon-Ti Alon-Ti merged commit a201e77 into dev Dec 8, 2024
16 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants