Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade Http::Stream::reply to Pointer #1855
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Upgrade Http::Stream::reply to Pointer #1855
Changes from all commits
2e0f637
944599f
3605a00
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's replace this unchecked/unwanted pointer with a reference instead of just changing its type:
... and adjust the function caller and pointer user accordingly.
The above will not make existing diff larger (because all these lines have to be changed anyway) but will improve code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If possible:
Otherwise:
The above suggestions account for another change request that replaces an unchecked pointer with a reference (but its essence is unrelated to that change request).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is the only canonize() caller that supplies a pointer, please upgrade the corresponding canonize() method to take a reference instead of a pointer. The method already asserts that the pointer is not nil.