-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NonEmpty graphs optimizations #94
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2e957ae
Start specialisation
nobrakal a906ff9
Add previous improvements
nobrakal b4341fa
Fix imports
nobrakal d4d8ee6
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/snowleopard/alga into Non…
nobrakal 38a079d
Prepare PR
nobrakal 2b67483
Allow ghc optimization for edgeCount
nobrakal 1345d59
drop edgeTuple
nobrakal 92921a9
Use ToGraph for "classic" edgeList
nobrakal fe0d04d
Remove now unecessary import
nobrakal 5d82119
redefine default instances
nobrakal File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since you now provide much faster implementations compared to the default ones in
ToGraph
, you should use them in theinstance ToGraph
declaration.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Writing this improvement in the
ToGraph
instance drop a the performances:Alga is the improvement moved in the ToGraph instance, and AlgaOld is the current state of this PR.
Mesh
Clique
I am not sure why...
I think this is because I can't use
NonEmpty
graphs inToGraph
, so I can 't useAlgebra.Graph.NonEmpty.Vertex
but onlyAlgebra.Graph.Vertex
, and thus, in the final step, I can only usefoldg
instead offoldg1
.Also, because we are not sure that
induce
is removing empty leaves, we loose the fasthasSelfLoop
(because it was defined inToGraph
ashasSelfLoop x = hasEdge x x
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nobrakal I meant this:
Surely this can't reduce the performace of
hasEdge
itself!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But users of the typeclass might get the benefit.
So, the rule is: if you use the default implementation, i.e.
x = T.x
then the instance declaration uses default methods. But otherwise you need to redefine default instance methods, i.e. addx = x
to the instance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yes, it is done now :)