Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FAKE PR] Coverage on unit tests only #968

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EmmaRenauld
Copy link
Contributor

@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld commented Apr 12, 2024

DO NOT MERGE.
For statistics.

@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld changed the title Coverage on unit tests only [FAKE PR] Coverage on unit tests only Apr 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.91%. Comparing base (118ce1c) to head (766cbd9).

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (118ce1c) and HEAD (766cbd9). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (118ce1c) HEAD (766cbd9)
unittests 2 1
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #968       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   69.52%   29.91%   -39.62%     
===========================================
  Files         448       92      -356     
  Lines       24087    10359    -13728     
  Branches     3295     1690     -1605     
===========================================
- Hits        16747     3099    -13648     
- Misses       5945     6999     +1054     
+ Partials     1395      261     -1134     
Components Coverage Δ
Scripts ∅ <ø> (∅)
Library 29.91% <ø> (-38.65%) ⬇️

@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch 5 times, most recently from e987490 to 6563ed5 Compare April 18, 2024 13:30
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch 2 times, most recently from 1f7591a to 2f414c1 Compare April 26, 2024 14:37
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch 3 times, most recently from a445621 to 7021e1a Compare May 13, 2024 13:25
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from 7021e1a to d08defa Compare August 27, 2024 19:10
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from d08defa to ef562a6 Compare September 5, 2024 15:56
@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Sep 5, 2024

Hello @EmmaRenauld, Thank you for updating !

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2024-09-25 15:50:33 UTC

@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from 47ddfe0 to a9dc9f9 Compare September 17, 2024 16:21
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch 2 times, most recently from 9d14780 to bf5f807 Compare September 25, 2024 15:52
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from bf5f807 to ec5f399 Compare November 11, 2024 19:23
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from ec5f399 to 537d0e4 Compare November 26, 2024 15:11
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch 2 times, most recently from 0e16c50 to 1262e46 Compare January 16, 2025 16:13
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld force-pushed the coverage_on_unit_tests_only branch from 1262e46 to 766cbd9 Compare January 21, 2025 20:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants