chore(deps): dedupe pnpm-lock.yaml

[ecospark]

I ran pnpm dedupe 🧑‍💻

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
performance-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
test-compiled-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
test-next-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm
test-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Oct 15, 2024 6:35pm

[github-actions]

No changes to documentation

[github-actions]

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Tue, 15 Oct 2024 18:29:53 GMT

Benchmark	reference latency of sanity@latest	experiment latency of this branch	Δ (%) latency difference
article (title)	18.5 efps (54ms)	16.9 efps (59ms)	+5ms (+9.3%)	✅
article (body)	59.9 efps (17ms)	56.2 efps (18ms)	+1ms (+6.6%)	✅
article (string inside object)	19.4 efps (52ms)	17.9 efps (56ms)	+5ms (+8.7%)	✅
article (string inside array)	14.9 efps (67ms)	14.5 efps (69ms)	+2ms (+3.0%)	✅
recipe (name)	28.6 efps (35ms)	27.8 efps (36ms)	+1ms (+2.9%)	✅
recipe (description)	31.3 efps (32ms)	30.3 efps (33ms)	+1ms (+3.1%)	✅
recipe (instructions)	99.9+ efps (9ms)	99.9+ efps (10ms)	+1ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (title)	14.5 efps (69ms)	14.5 efps (69ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (string inside object)	15.2 efps (66ms)	15.6 efps (64ms)	-2ms (-3.0%)	✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	54ms	58ms	64ms	255ms	1199ms	13.8s
article (body)	17ms	19ms	24ms	205ms	290ms	5.9s
article (string inside object)	52ms	58ms	72ms	196ms	1004ms	9.1s
article (string inside array)	67ms	71ms	118ms	247ms	1713ms	10.1s
recipe (name)	35ms	39ms	43ms	79ms	175ms	9.3s
recipe (description)	32ms	34ms	44ms	58ms	62ms	6.6s
recipe (instructions)	9ms	10ms	12ms	56ms	0ms	3.7s
synthetic (title)	69ms	76ms	80ms	445ms	2290ms	16.0s
synthetic (string inside object)	66ms	68ms	75ms	326ms	2116ms	10.7s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	59ms	61ms	72ms	235ms	432ms	14.3s
article (body)	18ms	20ms	23ms	175ms	246ms	5.6s
article (string inside object)	56ms	58ms	71ms	233ms	267ms	8.7s
article (string inside array)	69ms	73ms	81ms	272ms	1006ms	9.8s
recipe (name)	36ms	39ms	43ms	102ms	13ms	9.1s
recipe (description)	33ms	35ms	56ms	166ms	1ms	6.6s
recipe (instructions)	10ms	10ms	11ms	22ms	0ms	3.5s
synthetic (title)	69ms	73ms	82ms	488ms	1678ms	16.5s
synthetic (string inside object)	64ms	70ms	84ms	458ms	1617ms	10.5s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

• benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
• latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
• p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
• p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
• p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
• blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
• test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

[github-actions]

Component Testing Report Updated Oct 15, 2024 6:29 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details

File	Status	Duration	Passed	Skipped	Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	45s	15	0	0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	8s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	31s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	38s	11	7	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	12	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	18s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	10s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	3m 0s	0	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	45s	15	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 39s	21	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 17s	18	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	8s	3	9	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/RangeDecoration.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	25s	9	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	18s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	36s	12	0	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0