Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Jest CI: annotations only for failed tests #2645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023
Merged

Chore: Jest CI: annotations only for failed tests #2645

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

katspaugh
Copy link
Member

What it solves

A follow up on #2637

Disable line coverage annotations. Too spammy.

Screenshot 2023-10-17 at 14 15 32

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2023

Branch preview

✅ Deploy successful!

https://coverage--walletweb.review-wallet-web.5afe.dev

@katspaugh katspaugh requested a review from usame-algan October 17, 2023 12:20
@github-actions
Copy link

ESLint Summary View Full Report

Annotations are provided inline on the Files Changed tab. You can also see all annotations that were generated on the annotations page.

Type Occurrences Fixable
Errors 0 0
Warnings 0 0
Ignored 0 N/A
  • Result: ✅ success
  • Annotations: 0 total

Report generated by eslint-plus-action

@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
74.84% (+0.03% 🔼)
8962/11975
🔴 Branches
48.69% (+0.03% 🔼)
1806/3709
🔴 Functions
56.96% (+0.04% 🔼)
1322/2321
🟡 Lines
76.43% (+0.02% 🔼)
8099/10597

Test suite run success

961 tests passing in 133 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from c8f76af

@katspaugh katspaugh merged commit 8189cd7 into dev Oct 17, 2023
9 checks passed
@katspaugh katspaugh deleted the coverage branch October 17, 2023 12:37
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants