Update RFC, MCP, FCP and CFT sections for TWiR-535

draft/2024-02-21-this-week-in-rust.md

@@ -89,57 +89,38 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
 Changes to Rust follow the Rust [RFC (request for comments) process](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs). These
 are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
 
-<!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
-<!-- * []() -->
-
-<!--
-### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
-<!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
-<!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
--->
+* [eRFC: Iterate on and stabilize libtest's programmatic output](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3558)
 
 ### Final Comment Period
 
 Every week, [the team](https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
 which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
 
 #### [RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period)
-
-<!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
-<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
-
-#### [Tracking Issues & PRs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
-
-<!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
-<!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
-
-### [Language Reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
-<!-- Remove this section if empty>
-
-### [Unsafe Code Guidelines](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
-<!-- Remove this section if empty>
-
-### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
-
-<!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
-<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
-<!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
-
-### [Call for Testing](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
+* [RFC: Make Cargo respect minimum supported Rust version (MSRV) when selecting dependencies](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3537)
+
+#### Tracking Issues & PRs
+##### [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
+* [disposition: merge] [change equate for binders to not rely on subtyping](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118247)
+* [disposition: merge] [Implement RFC 3373: Avoid non-local definitions in functions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120393)
+* [disposition: merge] [Tracking Issue for `waker_getters`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96992)
+* [disposition: merge] [Stabilize the `#[diagnostic]` namespace and `#[diagnostic::on_unimplemented]` attribute](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119888)
+* [disposition: merge] [Tracking Issue for cfg-target-abi](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80970)
+* [disposition: merge] [make non-PartialEq-typed consts as patterns a hard error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120805)
+* [disposition: close] [Allow ?-converting from `Result<T, E>` in functions returning `Option<Result<T, E>>`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99333)
+* [disposition: merge] [Add Read Impl for &Stdin](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99153)
+* [disposition: merge] [Make `Barrier::new()` const ](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119536)
+* [disposition: close] [Implement `Future` for `Option<F>`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109691)
+
+#### [New and Updated RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls)
+* [new] [`is` operator for pattern-matching and binding](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3573)
+
+#### [Call for Testing](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing)
 An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
 implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.  The following
 RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
 
-<!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
-    * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
-        * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
-        * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
--->
-<!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
-<!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
+* *No RFCs issued a call for testing this week.*
 
 If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new `call-for-testing`
 label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature