Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rfcbot to compiler-team repo #1628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024
Merged

Add rfcbot to compiler-team repo #1628

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

Urgau
Copy link
Member

@Urgau Urgau commented Dec 15, 2024

Add rfcbot to the list of bots to the compiler-team reposiroty so that the bot can edit labels.

cf. https://www.github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/785#issuecomment-2544090585

Add `rfcbot` to the list of bots to the compiler-team reposiroty so that the bot can edit labels.

cf. https://www.github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/785#issuecomment-2544090585
@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

In triagebot#1747 (and then fixed in triagebot#1863) I have added the syntax @rfcbot concern to issue a fake command to register MCP concerns. Currently that command is a "no-op", just a device to let me keep track of MCP concerns.

I wonder what happens if the @rfcbot will be enabled for real. I guess we will discover when this PR is merged.

@Urgau
Copy link
Member Author

Urgau commented Dec 15, 2024

rfcbot != rustbot (aka triagebot), I don't think there will be any issue.

@apiraino
Copy link
Contributor

rfcbot != rustbot (aka triagebot), I don't think there will be any issue.

Ah ok, so that means that the invocation of @rfcbot concern1 is handled by another codebase https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcbot-rs

Footnotes

  1. looking into the issues 🤔

@jackh726 jackh726 merged commit f97d54d into rust-lang:master Dec 16, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants