Don't recommend const fns on a stable build without a note about nightlies #28507
Conversation
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
| "function calls in {}s are limited to \ | ||
| struct and enum constructors", v.msg()); | ||
| v.tcx.sess.span_note(e.span, | ||
| "A limited form of compile-time function \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I believe our error messages and such conventionally start with a lowercase letter
|
Looks like there's a travis failure as well |
Manishearth
force-pushed
the
const-stable
branch
from
a0d1954 to
7d72de1
Compare
|
Ah, I'd forgotten to push after fixing build errors. Addressed. |
| } else { | ||
| span_err!(v.tcx.sess, e.span, E0015, | ||
| "function calls in {}s are limited to \ | ||
| constant functions, \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you intend to mention "constant functions" on stable Rust?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I did. That's why I mention that "it is available on nightlies".
I'm okay with suggesting unstable features on a stable compiler, as long as it is mentioned that they are only available on nightlies (so that the user can evaluate switching to a nightly if constfn was indeed what they wanted). I want to avoid the bad UX of "compiler suggests thing, try thing, thing doesn't work because stable".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I see what you mean. Fixed.
Manishearth
force-pushed
the
const-stable
branch
from
7d72de1 to
dcf49b5
Compare
Fixes #28490
cc #24111