Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: onboard klaviyo bulk upload destination #3348

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Member

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai commented May 7, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Onboard klaviyo bulk upload destination. (CDK v2 implementation)

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-2056

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai self-assigned this May 7, 2024
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.30435% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.02%. Comparing base (d387bd1) to head (c308570).
Report is 38 commits behind head on develop.

Files Patch % Lines
...c/cdk/v2/destinations/klaviyo_bulk_upload/utils.js 90.90% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3348      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.03%   88.02%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          567      572       +5     
  Lines        30516    30841     +325     
  Branches      7304     7371      +67     
===========================================
+ Hits         26866    27149     +283     
- Misses        3319     3355      +36     
- Partials       331      337       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2024 18:53
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2024 18:53
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai requested review from sivashanmukh and a team as code owners May 15, 2024 19:18
Copy link
Member

@ItsSudip ItsSudip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we not using constructPayload function?

@yashasvibajpai
Copy link
Member Author

Why are we not using constructPayload function?

No mapping as such, we are already receiving correct field name from sources

Copy link

@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai merged commit f55c481 into develop Jun 18, 2024
16 checks passed
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai deleted the feat.klaviyo.bulk.upload branch June 18, 2024 10:59
@yashasvibajpai yashasvibajpai restored the feat.klaviyo.bulk.upload branch June 18, 2024 10:59
@devops-github-rudderstack devops-github-rudderstack deleted the feat.klaviyo.bulk.upload branch September 12, 2024 02:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants