Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(streaming): decouple memory manager tick interval with barrier #19494

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

MrCroxx
Copy link
Contributor

@MrCroxx MrCroxx commented Nov 20, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Previously, without sequence-based operator cache eviction, the memory manager needed to wait for barrier completions to update eviction info. However, it doesn't need that now.

We can decouple the memory manager tick interval with the barrier interval, to achieve more efficient operator cache eviction even when the barrier interval is high.

close #19403

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@MrCroxx MrCroxx requested review from hzxa21, fuyufjh and yuhao-su and removed request for hzxa21 November 20, 2024 14:17
Copy link
Contributor

@yuhao-su yuhao-su left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@MrCroxx MrCroxx added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit ea3e909 Nov 21, 2024
28 of 29 checks passed
@MrCroxx MrCroxx deleted the xx/interval branch November 21, 2024 05:44
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Avoid relying on barrier_interval_ms to increase operator cache eviction watermark
3 participants