Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: expose PK info in index system catalog #17262

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yezizp2012
Copy link
Member

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Resolve #17252 .

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 marked this pull request as draft June 14, 2024 09:37
@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 force-pushed the feat/expose-PK-indexes branch from 7e76c84 to 24ce152 Compare June 14, 2024 10:46
@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 06:17
Copy link
Contributor

@neverchanje neverchanje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Respect 🫡

@yezizp2012
Copy link
Member Author

The reason why I didn't add the PK info into rw_indexes is that all records in it are also treated as streaming jobs when it's used by other system views, which is error-prone.

@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit dfbce1b Jun 17, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
@yezizp2012 yezizp2012 deleted the feat/expose-PK-indexes branch June 17, 2024 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pg_index does not include primary keys
2 participants