Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wip] try to remove parallel unit from scheduling process with worker slot #16828

Closed
wants to merge 62 commits into from

Conversation

shanicky
Copy link
Contributor

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

shanicky and others added 30 commits April 17, 2024 01:46
Refactor fragment mappings and cleanup code

Refactor worker_node, enhance vnode logic, update imports & mapping

Refactor: Disable `FragmentParallelUnitMapping` in protobuf and Rust code

Refactor/gen: Improve formatting in `risingwave_common` tests

Removed proto comments; updated Rust imports and tests.

Remove `FragmentParallelUnitMapping` import and extra lines in `observer_manager.rs`

Refactor FragManager, cleanup proto fields & comments

Remove commented-out alternative vnode placement code

Refactor: Clean up imports in fragment and streaming_job

Refactor worker mapping in join operation

Refactor fields() output in db lib for brevity

Refine comments on migration and worker ID terms
Signed-off-by: Shanicky Chen <[email protected]>
@shanicky shanicky changed the base branch from main to peng/fe-remove-pu-slot May 20, 2024 06:56
@shanicky shanicky marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2024 10:16
@shanicky shanicky requested a review from a team as a code owner May 21, 2024 07:47
@shanicky shanicky mentioned this pull request May 27, 2024
6 tasks
Base automatically changed from peng/fe-remove-pu-slot to main May 28, 2024 07:19
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Jun 17, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
9425213 Triggered Generic Password a725cd0 ci/scripts/e2e-sink-test.sh View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

@shanicky shanicky closed this Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant