Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(udf): move UDF implementations to
expr_impl
#16759refactor(udf): move UDF implementations to
expr_impl
#16759Changes from 11 commits
2f91a28
7dffa28
882d8b4
dc71c16
c6b1a15
dc2e5ca
0291a23
498a3d4
ed88714
6261b2a
ef675c0
f13b617
801ad00
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBO I don't very like feature flags, but acceptable since there are already existing ones. 1 flag is as bad as N flags...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My consideration is that each UDF backend brings many dependencies, and most of our developers don't touch UDF at all. So it would be better to skip them in local development. The same thing could be applied to connectors. For example, I almost never use any connector in my development. Those dependencies could be skipped as well to save my disk.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, I think it's time to split connector implementations off and design a clear interface for it, as there are now community developers willing to develop new connectors. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW, #12981 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I noticed this PR. It's a little pity it was not merged, but I think it's in the right direction.