-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 597
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(binder): correctly bind rcte in bind_with
& bind_relation_by_name
#16023
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
24b7e4d
remove RecursiveUnion in BoundSetExpr; make it Either<BoundQuery, Rec…
xzhseh c7c4489
update fmt
xzhseh 5e7cd1c
update bind_relation_by_name
xzhseh fb8fe85
update comments; introduce BoundRecursiveUnion for bind_relation_by_name
xzhseh 89580d3
update fmt
xzhseh 78e5841
add aligned schema to RecursiveUnion
xzhseh d6ea53d
udpate fmt
xzhseh d7c0931
refactor bind_set_expr
xzhseh 3fc27bf
more comments; properly align the schema in bind_with
xzhseh 7b4b3d3
update fmt
xzhseh 9870b10
change to BoundSetExpr for lhs and rhs of union
xzhseh 4b00693
update fmt
xzhseh 2bccdce
make rewrite_exprs_recursive blanket to base and recursion exprs in B…
xzhseh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ps. the below example is copied from https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/pull/15522/files#r1524367781.
since under current definition of
union
, we can only getSetExpr
rather than an entireQuery
forleft
andright
.thus, should we use
BoundSetExpr
as a workaround (and also KISS) forRecursiveUnion
at present, or just initially conforming to postgres's behavior - which of course, need to modify some more stuff.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @chenzl25, @xiangjinwu.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using
BoundSetExpr
LGTM, becauseBoundQuery
andBoundSetExpr
contains each other actually. 🥵There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
then let's stick with
BoundSetExpr
first.