Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pass correct object store config to monitored object store for all backends #15260

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

hzxa21
Copy link
Collaborator

@hzxa21 hzxa21 commented Feb 26, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Previously, we only pass object store config to S3 object store only. This makes the timeout config to be None for all other object stores including all object store backends implemented via OpenDAL.

This should be the cause for #15209 and #15239.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

Copy link
Contributor

@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks~

@wcy-fdu
Copy link
Contributor

wcy-fdu commented Feb 26, 2024

Out of topic, do we still need await tree for opendal object store? #15259

@hzxa21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hzxa21 commented Feb 26, 2024

Out of topic, do we still need await tree for opendal object store? #15259

I think it depends on the complexity. If it is easy to integrate opendal await tree with our await tree, it is a good-to-have.

@wcy-fdu
Copy link
Contributor

wcy-fdu commented Feb 26, 2024

Out of topic, do we still need await tree for opendal object store? #15259

I think it depends on the complexity. If it is easy to integrate opendal await tree with our await tree, it is a good-to-have.

added in #15259, I think it's easy, and the result will added after risingwave’s original await tree

@hzxa21 hzxa21 added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2cfe136 Feb 26, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@hzxa21 hzxa21 deleted the patrick/fix-opendal-timeout branch February 26, 2024 09:52
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
zwang28 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Li0k Li0k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

zwang28 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
hzxa21 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
@hzxa21 hzxa21 mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2024
9 tasks
hzxa21 added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
lmatz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/fix Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants