feat(stream): concurrent fetch for temporal join (take 2)

[TennyZhuang]

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Previous try: Close #14666

Close #13974

Rework without any rust tricks :)

Checklist

• I have written necessary rustdoc comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
• I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
• My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
• My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)

• My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

• My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

[TennyZhuang]

No performance downgrade.

Due to the good locality of nexmark, we can't see a performance improvement.

[st1page]

Due to the good locality of nexmark, we can't see a performance improvement.

#15124

[chenzl25]

LGTM

[TennyZhuang]

When the dimensional table (10k records, q13) is all in memory, this PR did not bring significant performance loss (within the fluctuation range).
When the dimensional table (1b records, q13) experiences high cache misses, this PR brought a fivefold performance improvement.

I believe merging it is worthwhile.