feat(frontend): Add Create subscription in frontend

[xxhZs]

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

In this pr,

We added subscription to the rw_subscriptions rw_relation and rw_relation_info.
We support the parse, build_plan and execution of the statements

CREATE SUBSCRIPTION s1 FROM aaa WITH (retention = '1D') ;
DROP SUBSCRIPTION xxx;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION x1 RENAME TO x2 ;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION x1 OWNER TO user1;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION x1 SET SCHEMA test_schema;
ALTER SUBSCRIPTION x1 SET PARALLELISM = 4;
SHOW SUBSCRIPTIONS;
SHOW CREATE SUBSCRIPTION subscription1;

And in this pr, We have only added tests for SUBSCRIPTION ddl, the specific result tests will be added in the next pr

related #14316

Checklist

• I have written necessary rustdoc comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
• I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
• My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
• All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
• My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)

• My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

• My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

[github-actions]

license-eye has totally checked 4757 files.

Valid	Invalid	Ignored	Fixed
2067	1	2689	0

Click to see the invalid file list

• src/frontend/src/optimizer/mod.rs

[gitguardian]

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request

GitGuardian id	GitGuardian status	Secret	Commit	Filename
9425213	Triggered	Generic Password	eacebbe	ci/scripts/regress-test.sh	View secret

🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets

1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider

• following these best practices for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials
• install secret detection on pre-commit to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

---

<sup>🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Our GitHub checks need improvements? Share your feedbacks!</sup>

[hzxa21]

I am a bit concerned with a 2.3K LoC PR with zero test :(

Is it possible to split it into smaller PRs and add some tests (at least e2e tests).

[hzxa21]

Just to confirm: the breaking changes here are acceptable because Subscription feature is not released and no one is using it, right?

[xxhZs]

yesyes

[xxhZs]

After spilit out the meta code. the pr is left with only the frontend code which is slightly more than 1k in addition to the tests, the pr can continue to be reviewed

[wenym1]

Left a comment in the previous PR. Might be fixed by the way in this PR.
#15371 (comment)

[hzxa21]

LGTM. Please wait for other reviewers' review who are more familiar with optimizer/parser before merging.

[chenzl25]

Could you please test drop cascade for a table if it is used by a subscription?

create table t (..);
create subscription sub from t;
drop table t cascade;

[xxhZs]

Could you please test drop cascade for a table if it is used by a subscription?

create table t (..);
create subscription sub from t;
drop table t cascade;

test it, drop table t cascade; will drop sub;

[chenzl25]

LGTM!

[chenzl25]

Could you please test drop cascade for a table if it is used by a subscription?

create table t (..);
create subscription sub from t;
drop table t cascade;

test it, drop table t cascade; will drop sub;

I see, no wonder I couldn't find the relevant code in this PR, because it is supported in a previous PR.