Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(storage): should use epoch with the maximum offset when get #14607

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

wcy-fdu
Copy link
Contributor

@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu commented Jan 16, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

Fix #14598

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/fix Bug fix label Jan 16, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@hzxa21 hzxa21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM!

@@ -684,7 +685,11 @@ impl HummockVersionReader {
Sstable::hash_for_bloom_filter(dist_key.as_ref(), read_options.table_id.table_id())
});

let full_key = FullKey::new(read_options.table_id, TableKey(table_key.clone()), epoch);
let full_key = FullKey::new_with_gap_epoch(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add some documentations on why we need to use MAX_SPILL_OFFSET and add a UT to cover the bug?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure~

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about UT? Are we planning to add it in later PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu Jan 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, UT will be added after #14557 get merged because we need to remove enable_test_epoch first.

@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu enabled auto-merge January 16, 2024 14:57
@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 16, 2024
@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8b16eb7 Jan 17, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
@wcy-fdu wcy-fdu deleted the wcy/fix_spill_get branch January 17, 2024 02:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/fix Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: spilled data may be skipped on storage get
2 participants