Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: revert #13278 & #13390 for include syntax #13785

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023
Merged

fix: revert #13278 & #13390 for include syntax #13785

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

tabVersion
Copy link
Contributor

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

the motivation of the pr is to correct the behavior about when to add a column.

now we have a rfc about introducing columns not coming from value part risingwavelabs/rfcs#79 and will be implemented in #13707

now deprecating the hot fix related pr.

If any cluster cannot be recovered please rebuild the sources/tables with format plain

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/fix Bug fix label Dec 4, 2023
@tabVersion tabVersion changed the title fix: revert (#13278)[https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/pull/13278] & (#13390)[https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave/pull/13390] fix: revert #13278 & #13390 for include syntax Dec 4, 2023
@tabVersion
Copy link
Contributor Author

please review with caution, there is not much time left before releasing

Copy link
Contributor

@keven-huang keven-huang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DEFAULT_KEY_COLUMN_NAME => DataType::Bytea,

this line should be deleted

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (a73d940) 68.19% compared to head (c1becae) 68.24%.
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
src/connector/src/parser/plain_parser.rs 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/connector/src/parser/avro/parser.rs 97.95% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13785      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.19%   68.24%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1524     1524              
  Lines      262232   262186      -46     
==========================================
+ Hits       178829   178921      +92     
+ Misses      83403    83265     -138     
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 68.24% <96.20%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@keven-huang
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, I didn't find error.

Copy link
Member

@xxchan xxchan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this be merged directly to 1.5 instead of main?

Just asking.

@st1page
Copy link
Contributor

st1page commented Dec 4, 2023

Can this be merged directly to 1.5 instead of main?

Just asking.

I guess yes but this PR LGTM because we have determine deprecate the cyrrent implementation and it will be replaced by "include key as" ater.

@tabVersion tabVersion added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 4, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit e41b62f Dec 4, 2023
30 of 31 checks passed
@tabVersion tabVersion deleted the tab/revert branch December 4, 2023 10:51
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
@tabVersion
Copy link
Contributor Author

may also relate to #13521

tabVersion added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/fix Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants