Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(stream): add assertion on stream key consistency in StreamChunk Updates #12557

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

stdrc
Copy link
Member

@stdrc stdrc commented Sep 27, 2023

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

As suggested in #12539, this PR adds assertion on stream key consistency in U-/U+ rows in StreamChunk. Fix #12555.

Many end-2-end tests will fail, so whether to temporarily comment out the assert or fix all inconsistency before merging this PR is to be decided.

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

Copy link
Member

@BugenZhao BugenZhao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🫡

for record in chunk.records() {
// `chunk.records()` will check U-/U+ pairing
if let Record::Update { old_row, new_row } = record {
debug_assert!(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about adding a unit test for this?

Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been open for 60 days with no activity. Could you please update the status? Feel free to ping a reviewer if you are waiting for review.

@BugenZhao
Copy link
Member

BugenZhao commented Dec 11, 2023

After discussions, we decided to maintain the original semantics, that is, not assuming the stream key part unchanged.

@BugenZhao BugenZhao closed this Dec 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

introduce chunk validation in WrapperExecutor to check against Update stream key consistency
2 participants