You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Recently, I did a batch ingestion performance test which showed that the insert performance between table (180s) and append-only table (30s) has a huge gap. On second thought, I think it is possible to disable the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv and that is the case when users do the first batch ingestion of their historical data.
chenzl25
changed the title
feat:Ignore the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv
featdisable the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv
Jan 18, 2024
chenzl25
changed the title
featdisable the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv
feat: disable the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv
Jan 18, 2024
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Recently, I did a batch ingestion performance test which showed that the insert performance between table (180s) and append-only table (30s) has a huge gap. On second thought, I think it is possible to disable the conflict check for a table if it has no downstream mv and that is the case when users do the first batch ingestion of their historical data.
Experiment Result:
#14630 (comment)
#14630 (comment)
Describe the solution you'd like
No response
Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: