-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 344
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Instruction classes and execution results now support the pickle module #1795
Conversation
Bencher
Click to view all benchmark results
Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking View Public Perf Page Docs | Repo | Chat | Help |
test/unit/test_qpu.py
Outdated
# result_data=ResultData.from_qvm( | ||
# QVMResultData.from_memory_map({ | ||
# "int": RegisterData.from_i8([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]), | ||
# "float": RegisterData.from_f64([[0.1, 0.2, 0.3], [0.4, 0.5, 0.6]]) | ||
# }) | ||
# ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Stale?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, removed.
test/unit/test_qpu.py
Outdated
def test_pickle_qpu_execute_response(mock_encrypted_program): | ||
response = QPUExecuteResponse( | ||
job_id="some-job-id", | ||
_executable=mock_encrypted_program, | ||
execution_options=ExecutionOptions.default() | ||
) | ||
pickled_response = pickle.dumps(response) | ||
unpickled_response = pickle.loads(pickled_response) | ||
assert unpickled_response == response |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like we could have a function that specifically takes Any
and does this pickle roundtripping. Not sure if we'll ever add more logic to this, but having it in one place would make that easier.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorta like in test/unit/test_quilbase.py
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that idea, I parametrized the response types over a single test implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is great, and will be appreciated by many!
Do you know if pickling allow objects to be serialized/deserialized between Python runtimes on separate architectures? For example, if someone were to pickle execution results on ppc64le
using pyquil-grpc-web would they then be able to unpickle(?) from arm64
pyquil?
Not a blocking question, just curious.
Co-authored-by: jselig-rigetti <[email protected]>
While that isn't something I have first-hand experience with, the pickling format should be platform-agnostic. There are versioned protocols, but none of them mention platform specificity as an issue. |
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
numpy = "^1.25" | ||
scipy = "^1.11" | ||
rpcq = "^3.11.0" | ||
networkx = ">=2.5" | ||
qcs-sdk-python = "0.19.0" | ||
qcs-sdk-python = "0.19.2" | ||
quil = ">=0.11.2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Prior to qcs-sdk-python
0.19.2, quil
was required to be a specific version. That was meant to ensure compatibility between downstream users of both packages, but in practice that has been over-restrictive. This allows quil
to be updated separately from qcs-sdk-python, at least between breaking changes.
pyproject.toml
Outdated
@@ -19,12 +19,13 @@ packages = [{ include = "pyquil" }] | |||
exclude = ["pyquil/conftest.py"] | |||
|
|||
[tool.poetry.dependencies] | |||
python = "^3.9,<=3.14" | |||
python = "^3.9,<=4.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will close #1793.
test/unit/test_qpu.py
Outdated
# result_data=ResultData.from_qvm( | ||
# QVMResultData.from_memory_map({ | ||
# "int": RegisterData.from_i8([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]]), | ||
# "float": RegisterData.from_f64([[0.1, 0.2, 0.3], [0.4, 0.5, 0.6]]) | ||
# }) | ||
# ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed, removed.
test/unit/test_qpu.py
Outdated
def test_pickle_qpu_execute_response(mock_encrypted_program): | ||
response = QPUExecuteResponse( | ||
job_id="some-job-id", | ||
_executable=mock_encrypted_program, | ||
execution_options=ExecutionOptions.default() | ||
) | ||
pickled_response = pickle.dumps(response) | ||
unpickled_response = pickle.loads(pickled_response) | ||
assert unpickled_response == response |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that idea, I parametrized the response types over a single test implementation.
Description
This closes #1719 (along w/ an additional request to support
QPUExecuteResponse
), and #1791 (but for all instruction classes).Waiting on some upstream changes to land, once they do, this PR should pass CI.
Checklist
master
branch