Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: CompilerISA.dict() now uses the correct default field names: qubits and edges #1746

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

MarquessV
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes #1745

Checklist

  • The PR targets the master branch
  • The above description motivates these changes.
  • The change is atomic and can be described by a single commit (your PR will be squashed on merge).
  • All changes to code are covered via unit tests.
  • Parameters and return values have type hints with PEP 484 syntax.
  • Functions and classes have useful Sphinx-style docstrings.
  • (Bugfix) The associated issue is referenced above using auto-close keywords.

@MarquessV MarquessV requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2024 00:20
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2024

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
7148 6297 88% 87% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

No covered modified files...

updated for commit: d34d62c by action🐍

@MarquessV MarquessV merged commit 65240a0 into master Feb 27, 2024
22 checks passed
@MarquessV MarquessV deleted the fix-isa-dict-representation branch February 27, 2024 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CompilerISA.dict() uses wrong field names
1 participant