Ancestry is a gem that allows the records of a Ruby on Rails ActiveRecord model to be organised as a tree structure (or hierarchy). It uses a single database column, using the materialised path pattern. It exposes all the standard tree structure relations (ancestors, parent, root, children, siblings, descendants) and all of them can be fetched in a single SQL query. Additional features are STI support, scopes, depth caching, depth constraints, easy migration from older gems, integrity checking, integrity restoration, arrangement of (sub)tree into hashes and different strategies for dealing with orphaned records.
To apply Ancestry to any ActiveRecord
model, follow these simple steps:
- Add to Gemfile:
# Gemfile
gem 'ancestry'
- Install required gems:
$ bundle install
- Create migration:
$ rails g migration add_ancestry_to_[table] ancestry:string:index
- Migrate your database:
$ rake db:migrate
- Add to app/models/.rb:
# app/models/[model.rb]
class [Model] < ActiveRecord::Base
has_ancestry
end
Your model is now a tree!
In version 1.2.0 the acts_as_tree method was renamed to has_ancestry
in order to allow usage of both the acts_as_tree gem and the ancestry gem in a
single application. method acts_as_tree
will continue to be supported in the future.
You can use the parent attribute to organise your records into a tree. If you have the id of the record you want to use as a parent and don't want to fetch it, you can also use parent_id. Like any virtual model attributes, parent and parent_id can be set using parent= and parent_id= on a record or by including them in the hash passed to new, create, create!, update_attributes and update_attributes!. For example:
TreeNode.create! :name => 'Stinky', :parent => TreeNode.create!(:name => 'Squeeky')
You can also create children through the children relation on a node:
node.children.create :name => 'Stinky'
To navigate an Ancestry model, use the following instance methods:
method | return value |
---|---|
parent |
parent of the record, nil for a root node |
parent_id |
parent id of the record, nil for a root node |
root |
root of the record's tree, self for a root node |
root_id |
root id of the record's tree, self for a root node |
root? is_root? |
true if the record is a root node, false otherwise |
ancestors |
ancestors of the record, starting with the root and ending with the parent |
ancestors? |
true if the record has ancestors (aka not a root node) |
ancestor_ids |
ancestor ids of the record |
path |
path of the record, starting with the root and ending with self |
path_ids |
a list the path ids, starting with the root id and ending with the node's own id |
children |
direct children of the record |
child_ids |
direct children's ids |
has_parent? ancestors? |
true if the record has a parent, false otherwise |
has_children? children? |
true if the record has any children, false otherwise |
is_childless? childless? |
true is the record has no children, false otherwise |
siblings |
siblings of the record, the record itself is included* |
sibling_ids |
sibling ids |
has_siblings? siblings? |
true if the record's parent has more than one child |
is_only_child? only_child? |
true if the record is the only child of its parent |
descendants |
direct and indirect children of the record |
descendant_ids |
direct and indirect children's ids of the record |
subtree |
the model on descendants and itself |
subtree_ids |
a list of all ids in the record's subtree |
depth |
the depth of the node, root nodes are at depth 0 |
* If the record is a root, other root records are considered siblings * Siblings returns the record itself
There are also instance methods to determine the relationship between 2 nodes:
method | return value |
---|---|
parent_of?(node) |
node's parent is this record |
root_of?(node) |
node's root is this record |
ancestor_of?(node) |
node's ancestors include this record |
child_of?(node) |
node is record's parent |
The has_ancestry method supports the following options:
:ancestry_column Pass in a symbol to store ancestry in a different column
:orphan_strategy Instruct Ancestry what to do with children of a node that is destroyed:
:destroy All children are destroyed as well (default)
:rootify The children of the destroyed node become root nodes
:restrict An AncestryException is raised if any children exist
:adopt The orphan subtree is added to the parent of the deleted node.
If the deleted node is Root, then rootify the orphan subtree.
:cache_depth Cache the depth of each node in the 'ancestry_depth' column (default: false)
If you turn depth_caching on for an existing model:
- Migrate: add_column [table], :ancestry_depth, :integer, :default => 0
- Build cache: TreeNode.rebuild_depth_cache!
:depth_cache_column Pass in a symbol to store depth cache in a different column
:primary_key_format Supply a regular expression that matches the format of your primary key.
By default, primary keys only match integers ([0-9]+).
:touch Instruct Ancestry to touch the ancestors of a node when it changes, to
invalidate nested key-based caches. (default: false)
Where possible, the navigation methods return scopes instead of records, this means additional ordering, conditions, limits, etc. can be applied and that the result can be either retrieved, counted or checked for existence. For example:
node.children.where(:name => 'Mary').exists?
node.subtree.order(:name).limit(10).each { ... }
node.descendants.count
For convenience, a couple of named scopes are included at the class level:
roots Root nodes
ancestors_of(node) Ancestors of node, node can be either a record or an id
children_of(node) Children of node, node can be either a record or an id
descendants_of(node) Descendants of node, node can be either a record or an id
subtree_of(node) Subtree of node, node can be either a record or an id
siblings_of(node) Siblings of node, node can be either a record or an id
Thanks to some convenient rails magic, it is even possible to create nodes through the children and siblings scopes:
node.children.create
node.siblings.create!
TestNode.children_of(node_id).new
TestNode.siblings_of(node_id).create
When depth caching is enabled (see has_ancestry options), five more named scopes can be used to select nodes on their depth:
before_depth(depth) Return nodes that are less deep than depth (node.depth < depth)
to_depth(depth) Return nodes up to a certain depth (node.depth <= depth)
at_depth(depth) Return nodes that are at depth (node.depth == depth)
from_depth(depth) Return nodes starting from a certain depth (node.depth >= depth)
after_depth(depth) Return nodes that are deeper than depth (node.depth > depth)
The depth scopes are also available through calls to descendants, descendant_ids, subtree, subtree_ids, path and ancestors. In this case, depth values are interpreted relatively. Some examples:
node.subtree(:to_depth => 2) Subtree of node, to a depth of node.depth + 2 (self, children and grandchildren)
node.subtree.to_depth(5) Subtree of node to an absolute depth of 5
node.descendants(:at_depth => 2) Descendant of node, at depth node.depth + 2 (grandchildren)
node.descendants.at_depth(10) Descendants of node at an absolute depth of 10
node.ancestors.to_depth(3) The oldest 4 ancestors of node (its root and 3 more)
node.path(:from_depth => -2) The node's grandparent, parent and the node itself
node.ancestors(:from_depth => -6, :to_depth => -4)
node.path.from_depth(3).to_depth(4)
node.descendants(:from_depth => 2, :to_depth => 4)
node.subtree.from_depth(10).to_depth(12)
Please note that depth constraints cannot be passed to ancestor_ids and path_ids. The reason for this is that both these relations can be fetched directly from the ancestry column without performing a database query. It would require an entirely different method of applying the depth constraints which isn't worth the effort of implementing. You can use ancestors(depth_options).map(&:id) or ancestor_ids.slice(min_depth..max_depth) instead.
Ancestry works fine with STI. Just create a STI inheritance hierarchy and build an Ancestry tree from the different classes/models. All Ancestry relations that were described above will return nodes of any model type. If you do only want nodes of a specific subclass you'll have to add a condition on type for that.
Ancestry can arrange an entire subtree into nested hashes for easy navigation after retrieval from the database. TreeNode.arrange could for example return:
{
#<TreeNode id: 100018, name: "Stinky", ancestry: nil> => {
#<TreeNode id: 100019, name: "Crunchy", ancestry: "100018"> => {
#<TreeNode id: 100020, name: "Squeeky", ancestry: "100018/100019"> => {}
},
#<TreeNode id: 100021, name: "Squishy", ancestry: "100018"> => {}
}
}
The arrange method also works on a scoped class, for example:
TreeNode.find_by_name('Crunchy').subtree.arrange
The arrange method takes ActiveRecord
find options. If you want your hashes to
be ordered, you should pass the order to the arrange method instead of to the
scope. example:
TreeNode.find_by_name('Crunchy').subtree.arrange(:order => :name)
To get the arranged nodes as a nested array of hashes for serialization:
TreeNode.arrange_serializable
[
{
"ancestry" => nil, "id" => 1, "children" => [
{ "ancestry" => "1", "id" => 2, "children" => [] }
]
}
]
You can also supply your own serialization logic using blocks:
For example, using ActiveModel
Serializers:
TreeNode.arrange_serializable do |parent, children|
MySerializer.new(parent, children: children)
end
Or plain hashes:
TreeNode.arrange_serializable do |parent, children|
{
my_id: parent.id,
my_children: children
}
end
The result of arrange_serializable can easily be serialized to json with
to_json
, or some other format:
TreeNode.arrange_serializable.to_json
You can also pass the order to the arrange_serializable method just as you can pass it to the arrange method:
TreeNode.arrange_serializable(:order => :name)
If you just want to sort an array of nodes as if you were traversing them in preorder, you can use the sort_by_ancestry class method:
TreeNode.sort_by_ancestry(array_of_nodes)
Note that since materialised path trees don't support ordering within a rank, the order of siblings depends on their order in the original array.
Most current tree plugins use a parent_id column (has_ancestry, awesome_nested_set, better_nested_set, acts_as_nested_set). With ancestry it is easy to migrate from any of these plugins, to do so, use the build_ancestry_from_parent_ids! method on your ancestry model. These steps provide a more detailed explanation:
-
Add ancestry column to your table
- Create migration: rails g migration add_ancestry_to_ ancestry:string
- Add index to migration: add_index [table], :ancestry (UP) / remove_index [table], :ancestry (DOWN)
- Migrate your database: rake db:migrate
-
Remove old tree gem and add in Ancestry to
Gemfile
- See 'Installation' for more info on installing and configuring gems
-
Change your model
- Remove any macros required by old plugin/gem from
[app/models/](model).rb
- Add to
[app/models/](model).rb
:has_ancestry
- Remove any macros required by old plugin/gem from
-
Generate ancestry columns
- In './script.console': [model].build_ancestry_from_parent_ids!
- Make sure it worked ok: [model].check_ancestry_integrity!
-
Change your code
- Most tree calls will probably work fine with ancestry
- Others must be changed or proxied
- Check if all your data is intact and all tests pass
-
Drop parent_id column:
- Create migration:
rails g migration [remove_parent_id_from_](table)
- Add to migration:
remove_column [table], :parent_id
- Migrate your database:
rake db:migrate
- Create migration:
I don't see any way Ancestry tree integrity could get compromised without explicitly setting cyclic parents or invalid ancestry and circumventing validation with update_attribute, if you do, please let me know.
Ancestry includes some methods for detecting integrity problems and restoring integrity just to be sure. To check integrity use: [Model].check_ancestry_integrity!. An AncestryIntegrityException will be raised if there are any problems. You can also specify :report => :list to return an array of exceptions or :report => :echo to echo any error messages. To restore integrity use: [Model].restore_ancestry_integrity!.
For example, from IRB:
>> stinky = TreeNode.create :name => 'Stinky'
$ #<TreeNode id: 1, name: "Stinky", ancestry: nil>
>> squeeky = TreeNode.create :name => 'Squeeky', :parent => stinky
$ #<TreeNode id: 2, name: "Squeeky", ancestry: "1">
>> stinky.update_attribute :parent, squeeky
$ true
>> TreeNode.all
$ [#<TreeNode id: 1, name: "Stinky", ancestry: "1/2">, #<TreeNode id: 2, name: "Squeeky", ancestry: "1/2/1">]
>> TreeNode.check_ancestry_integrity!
!! Ancestry::AncestryIntegrityException: Conflicting parent id in node 1: 2 for node 1, expecting nil
>> TreeNode.restore_ancestry_integrity!
$ [#<TreeNode id: 1, name: "Stinky", ancestry: 2>, #<TreeNode id: 2, name: "Squeeky", ancestry: nil>]
Additionally, if you think something is wrong with your depth cache:
>> TreeNode.rebuild_depth_cache!
git clone [email protected]:stefankroes/ancestry.git
cd ancestry
cp test/database.example.yml test/database.yml
bundle
appraisal install
# all tests
appraisal rake test
# single test version (sqlite and rails 5.0)
appraisal sqlite3-ar-50 rake test
Ancestry stores a path from the root to the parent for every node. This is a variation on the materialised path database pattern. It allows Ancestry to fetch any relation (siblings, descendants, etc.) in a single SQL query without the complicated algorithms and incomprehensibility associated with left and right values. Additionally, any inserts, deletes and updates only affect nodes within the affected node's own subtree.
In the example above, the ancestry
column is created as a string
. This puts a
limitation on the depth of the tree of about 40 or 50 levels. To increase the
maximum depth of the tree, increase the size of the string
or use text
to
remove the limitation entirely. Changing it to a text will however decrease
performance because an index cannot be put on the column in that case.
The materialised path pattern requires Ancestry to use a 'like' condition in
order to fetch descendants. The wild character (%
) is on the right of the
query, so indexes should be used.
Question? Bug report? Faulty/incomplete documentation? Feature request? Please post an issue on 'http://github.com/stefankroes/ancestry/issues'. Make sure you have read the documentation and you have included tests and documentation with any pull request.
Copyright (c) 2016 Stefan Kroes, released under the MIT license