Add RHEL 10 platform support #1070
Conversation
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
add-support-for-rhel10-platform
branch
from
1e28979 to
5ca779f
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | |||
| # Validate installed packages on RHEL 10 system. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are these copied from somewhere? Should they maybe be symlinks to some common files?
Just asking for possible followup improvements, not nacking this :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe, I think we haven't been using (modifying) this structure enough to start thinking about it yet (copied the stuff so far).
This fragment would be shared between three rhel platforms (rhel8, rhel9, rhel10 ) so maybe we could create a rhel folder as a target for symlinks (or link to rhel8?).
I'd be a bit afraid of trying to be generic at too high cost at this point, but we can track it as a potential follow-up issue.
| source network-device-names.cfg | ||
| export KSTEST_URL='http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/rhel-10/nightly/RHEL-10/latest-RHEL-10.0.0/compose/BaseOS/x86_64/os/' | ||
| export KSTEST_MODULAR_URL='http://download.eng.bos.redhat.com/rhel-10/nightly/RHEL-10/latest-RHEL-10.0.0/compose/AppStream/x86_64/os/' | ||
| export KSTEST_FTP_URL='ftp://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/$basearch/os/' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this non-standard mirror ok for the ftp?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is not, but we don't have a better one. The ftp test (the one using this var) is disabled on rhel.
KKoukiou
dismissed
their stale review
Let's wait for tests, I am not aware if this change is complete.
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
add-support-for-rhel10-platform
branch
from
5ca779f to
0575ae3
Compare
|
Updated the paths to repositories. |
For RHEL 10 adds: - default repositories - platform ks fragments
rvykydal
force-pushed
the
add-support-for-rhel10-platform
branch
from
0575ae3 to
fa3046c
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| ostreecontainer --no-signature-verification --transport=registry --url=quay.io/centos-bootc/centos-bootc:stream10 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not available and probably won't be anytime soon, so tests depending on this fragment will fail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's ok, we will see it and address it separately.
Yes we are, first lets's run the tests, then look at what is failing, why, and update or disable tests, or create issues to address the failures for rhel10 |
For RHEL 10 adds:
With the PR it should be possible to run kstests with RHEL 10 boot.iso locally updating the KSTEST_URL - it is still empty, so marking as DRAFT.PRs for adding rhel10 scenario for daily runs (#1071) and workflow for test on PR on rhel-10 anaconda branch will follow.