-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow drag-and-dropping multiple containers and views in the blueprint tree #8334
Conversation
Web viewer built successfully. If applicable, you should also test it:
Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit. |
a07e4e5
to
219b298
Compare
I haven't been able to actually drop any dragged entities yet. Is that intended to work here or is it just dragging? |
Yeah this PR is just about views/container but lays the groundwork. Support for dragging entities will come next. |
Ignore for now if this is just super premature design feedback but I don't like the experience of showing an error all the time. If we want to show an error on the drag-pill it feels like that should be reserved for situations where I clearly want to drop it somewhere but that doesn't work. drag-and-drop.mp4 |
I expected the result of both these kinds of drags to have an effect: no-ordering-effect.mp4no-effect-2.mp4 |
Yeah it broke it apparently. I'll fix it before this gets undrafted. |
- add `undraggable_items` to `ViewerContext` and populate with root container
002b15f
to
1c09ca9
Compare
# Conflicts: # crates/viewer/re_view_bar_chart/src/view_class.rs # crates/viewer/re_view_graph/src/ui/draw.rs # crates/viewer/re_view_map/src/map_view.rs # crates/viewer/re_viewer/src/app_state.rs # crates/viewer/re_viewer_context/src/contents.rs # examples/rust/custom_view/src/color_coordinates_view.rs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code mostly LGTM, but I don't know when to pass true
or false
to handle_select_hover_drag_interactions
. I would like to either have clear instructions, or better yet: have it be automatic (e.g. based on the items passed to it)
&response, | ||
Item::DataResult(query.view_id, instance_path.clone()), | ||
false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of adding false
and true
as argument, did you consider having two different functions, for increased readability? In particular, it is very hard for me reviewing this code to know what false
means.
I.e. you could have kept the old select_hovered_on_click
with the previous meaning, and added handle_select_hover_drag_interactions
(without a bool
) for draggable things. But maybe its better to force each users to consider wether or not an item is draggable in this context?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I want people to think of draggability and make a call when using this function.
It's also a toggle that allows me to progressively implement draggability one UI area at a time (e.g. next PR will switch some items to true
in the streams tree).
There is an ideal version of the future where this is true
everywhere (and thus the arg can be removed), but I'm not sure this is realistic. There are cases where stuff should hover/select highlight, but not be draggable. For example, entity buttons should probably not be draggable—or at least not always (e.g. from the add/remove entity modal).
In generally, we should make something draggable only if it makes sense, e.g if there is an obvious drop destination.
I'll improve the docstring to expand on the above. Let me know if you have any further suggestion on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code mostly LGTM, but I don't know when to pass true
or false
to handle_select_hover_drag_interactions
. I would like to either have clear instructions, or better yet: have it be automatic (e.g. based on the items passed to it)
That's a design decision we made because the red pill was worse. The lack of pill is feedback that the current selection is not draggable. As for this specific view: the next PR will enable dragging entities, so with it, every item in the blueprint tree will be individually draggable (or in homogenous multiple selection). This is not generally true however. For example, in the streams tree the entities will be draggable, but not the components. |
Co-authored-by: Emil Ernerfeldt <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for addressing the feedback!
/// If a selection contains any `undraggable_items`, it may not be dragged. | ||
pub undraggable_items: &'a ItemCollection, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can at least document it here exactly what it is was introduced for, and maybe with a TODO for "this is ugly; if you have a better idea please rewrite this" :]
Related
What
This PR makes it possible to drag multi-selection of views and containers within the blueprint tree. It lays the foundation of a system that will be extended to other drag payload and UI sections.
Specifically:
ctx.handle_select_hover_drag_interactions()
(formerlyctx.select_hovered_on_click()
) is now able to initiate drag interactions. This is opt-in for now, as dragging from most place isn't supported yet (to implemented in follow-up PRs).DragAndDropPayload
type to interoperate between various part of the UI. This type also enforce the grouping of items that can meaningfully be dragged together (e.g. it's ok to drag a view and a container together, because there exist somewhere they can be dropped to, but it's not ok to drag a view and an entity together).master
.