Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @testing-library/react to v16 #1798

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@testing-library/react ^15.0.2 -> ^16.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

testing-library/react-testing-library (@​testing-library/react)

v16.0.0

Compare Source

Features
  • Move @testing-library/dom and @types/react-dom to peer dependencies (#​1305) (a4744fa)
BREAKING CHANGES
  • @testing-library/dom was moved to a peer dependency and needs to be explicitly installed. This reduces the chance of having conflicting versions of @testing-library/dom installed that frequently caused bugs when used with @testing-library/user-event. We will also be able to allow new versions of @testing-library/dom being used without a SemVer major release of @testing-library/react by just widening the peer dependency.
    @types/react-dom needs to be installed if you're typechecking files using @testing-library/react.

Co-authored-by: Matan Borenkraout [email protected]


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot added the ok-to-test label Jun 3, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from stuartwdouglas June 3, 2024 15:59
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Hi @renovate[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a redhat-appstudio member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 44.88%. Comparing base (1417ad6) to head (27ac031).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1798   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     44.88%   44.88%           
  Complexity      805      805           
=========================================
  Files           279      279           
  Lines         11996    11996           
  Branches       1435     1435           
=========================================
  Hits           5385     5385           
  Misses         5974     5974           
  Partials        637      637           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rnc rnc merged commit 2893ea8 into main Jun 3, 2024
20 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/major-testing-library-monorepo branch June 3, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant