Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move to multi-cluster controller with added resiliency of managed resources #218

Conversation

umangachapagain
Copy link
Contributor

@umangachapagain umangachapagain commented Jul 3, 2024

Until now, blue secret controller only watched for resources on local cluster and replicated it to the hub. In case the resource gets deleted on the hub, it would not be reconciled until a reconcile is triggered from the local cluster.
Similarly, green secret controller only watched resources on the hub and replicated it to local cluster. In case the resource gets deleted on the local cluster, it would not be reconciled until a reconcile is triggered from the hub cluster.

With this change, each of these controllers will watch for the resources that it creates on a different cluster and immediately reconciles in when a change is observed.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: umangachapagain

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Jul 3, 2024
@umangachapagain umangachapagain marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2024 08:12
@umangachapagain
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
There are some issues with RBACs that needs fixing.

@umangachapagain umangachapagain force-pushed the multicluster-controller branch from 7611dad to 79c59a7 Compare July 18, 2024 16:33
@umangachapagain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found some design flaws with this approach. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant