Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nx-cugraph: xfail test_louvain.py:test_threshold in Python 3.9 #3944

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

eriknw
Copy link
Contributor

@eriknw eriknw commented Oct 19, 2023

This test is flaky b/c Louvain in PLC does not have a seed or random state parameter. This test holds the seed fixed and changes the threshold, but clearly this may not work if we can't set the seed.

@eriknw eriknw requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 17:18
@rlratzel rlratzel added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Oct 20, 2023
@rlratzel
Copy link
Contributor

This test is flaky b/c Louvain in PLC does not have a seed or random state parameter.

Should we also file an issue to add a seed/random state param to PLC Louvain? cc @ChuckHastings

@ChuckHastings
Copy link
Collaborator

This test is flaky b/c Louvain in PLC does not have a seed or random state parameter.

Should we also file an issue to add a seed/random state param to PLC Louvain? cc @ChuckHastings

There is no randomness in our C++ Louvain implementation, it is deterministic based on the vertex numbering. We are exploring some updates related to Leiden that might add some randomness, but the current implementation uses none.

@BradReesWork
Copy link
Member

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit d9a8dc7 into rapidsai:branch-23.12 Oct 23, 2023
71 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants