Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update vdi-setup.md #1367

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update vdi-setup.md #1367

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Ukonhattu
Copy link
Contributor

@Ukonhattu Ukonhattu commented Jan 17, 2025

change nvm install latest to nvm install

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated VDI setup instructions for Node.js installation
    • Clarified specific Node.js version requirements for the project
    • Improved guidance on installing the correct Node.js version

change nvm install latest to nvm install
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the documentation in the docs/vdi-setup.md file, specifically focusing on clarifying the Node.js installation instructions. The changes provide more precise guidance on installing the project's specific Node.js version, modifying the installation command and contextual description to ensure users understand the correct approach to setting up the development environment.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/vdi-setup.md Updated Node.js installation instructions to specify project-specific version installation and clarify the context of the installation process

Suggested labels

docs

Suggested reviewers

  • nygrenh

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's guide to Node.js delight,
Install with care, get the version just right!
In secret-project's root, a version awaits,
NVM's magic touch, no more setup debates!
Clarity springs forth, documentation gleams! 🔧


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Ukonhattu Ukonhattu requested a review from nygrenh January 17, 2025 11:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e636db2 and 6acd90f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/vdi-setup.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: headless_lms
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build-and-deploy
  • GitHub Check: code-style
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/vdi-setup.md (1)

90-90: LGTM! Clear improvement in the instruction.

The updated heading better communicates that a specific Node.js version is required for the project, rather than suggesting the latest version should be used.


```bash
nvm install lts
nvm install
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Missing Node.js version configuration for nvm install

The command nvm install without version arguments requires a .nvmrc or .node-version file to automatically detect the Node.js version, but neither file exists in the project root. This means developers might end up using different Node.js versions, potentially leading to inconsistencies.

  • Add a .nvmrc file in the project root specifying the required Node.js version
  • Update the documentation to either specify the version explicitly or mention that .nvmrc will be used
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Using nvm install is the correct approach.

The command nvm install without version arguments will automatically use the version specified in the project's .nvmrc or .node-version file, ensuring all developers use the same Node.js version.

Let's verify the presence of Node.js version configuration:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Node.js version configuration files in the project root

echo "Checking for Node.js version configuration files..."
fd -t f "^\.nvmrc$|^\.node-version$" --max-depth 1

Length of output: 165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Node.js version specification
echo "Checking package.json for Node.js version..."
fd -t f "^package\.json$" --max-depth 1 -x cat {}

echo -e "\nChecking for Node.js version in docs/vdi-setup.md..."
cat docs/vdi-setup.md

Length of output: 7740

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant