Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add a note on extracting multiline processing in comprehensions #148

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
Using ``map()`` or ``filter()`` where list comprehension is possible
====================================================================
Using ``map()`` or ``filter()``
===============================

For transformations that can be expressed as a list comprehension, use list comprehensions over ``map()`` or ``filter()``. Although a ``map()`` or ``filter()`` expression may be functionally equivalent to a list comprehension, the list comprehension is more concise and easier to read. For expressions that are too long or complicated to express directly within a comprehension extract them into a function.

For simple transformations that can be expressed as a list comprehension, use list comprehensions over ``map()`` or ``filter()``. Although a ``map()`` or ``filter()`` expression may be functionally equivalent to a list comprehension, the list comprehension is generally more concise and easier to read.

Anti-pattern
------------
Expand All @@ -26,10 +27,23 @@ In the modified code below, the code uses a list comprehension to generate the s
values = [1, 2, 3]
doubles = [x * 2 for x in values]

Sometimes a condition or process is too complicated or impossible to express in a single expression, for those extract them to a function and use a comprehension:

.. code:: python

def process(v):
if v.ham == "spam":
return 4
if v.bacon == "eggs"
return 7

def cond(v): ...

[process(x) for x in items if cond(v)] # preferable to map(process, filter(cond, items))

Copy link
Contributor Author

@graingert graingert Feb 28, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about also a note on how to combine cond and process?

Sometimes a condition or process may repeat computation unnecessarily, in those cases extract a function that returns an iterable with the result or an empty iterable:

.. code:: python
    hams = [x["ham"] for x in items if "ham" in x]  # duplicate key lookup

.. code:: python
    def process(x):
        try:
            return (x["ham"],)
        except KeyError:
            return ()

    hams = [ham for x in items for ham in process(x)]

Copy link
Contributor Author

@graingert graingert Feb 28, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's also often possible to inline this empty iterable into the comprehension

.. code:: python
    hams = [x["ham"] for x in items if x.get("ham") is not None]  # duplicated key lookup

.. code:: python
    hams = [
        ham
        for x in items
        for ham in (x.get("ham"),)
        if ham is not None
    ]

and alternative in python 3.8+ is

.. code:: python
    hams = [
        ham
        for x in items
        if (ham := x.get("ham")) is not None
    ]

References
----------

- PyLint - W0110, deprecated-lambda
- `Oliver Fromme - List Comprehensions <http://www.secnetix.de/olli/Python/list_comprehensions.hawk>`_