Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve unit test #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2023
Merged

Improve unit test #87

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2023

Conversation

woodsp-ibm
Copy link
Member

Summary

I noticed that the VQE instance in a unit test seemed to be passed an estimator twice. The latter parameter named estimator was however an optimizer from the ddt data. Given it's confusing I changed the parameter name as well as the test case name which maybe more what it was in the past but is rather out of date now/

Details and comments

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6460624991

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 90.529%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6457015934: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 6452
Relevant Lines: 7127

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Collaborator

@ElePT ElePT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks Steve.

@ElePT ElePT merged commit 745a892 into qiskit-community:main Oct 13, 2023
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants