-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bad error message when PjRtComputationClient
throws exception
#5946
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ea7c75c
Fix confusing error message when `PjRtComputationClient` throws excep…
will-cromar 56470fa
format
will-cromar 4e3e9cb
remove extra default arg
will-cromar 27d02ee
Make `CreateClient` anonymous
will-cromar ae4a86a
`exchange -> =`
will-cromar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between this and the original approach, since both rely on the static initializer? It seems like the logic has just been moved out of CreateClient and into the lambda.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's right. This lets me skip checking the case where this function gets called twice, the handling of which causes the bad error message. C++11 statics will ensure that it only completes once, and the function is anonymous now, which will prevent future code from erroneously calling
CreateClient
somewhere else in the future.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see, the lambda is guaranteed to only ever be called once. Do we know how
CreateClient
was called twice in the first place?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added that check to defend against future errors (likely by future me). There was never a case in the original code where
CreateClient
actually completed twice or was called concurrently.The bad error messaging occurred when the constructor of
PjRtComputationClient
threw an exception.g_computation_client_initialized
was never reset tofalse
,GetComputationClientIfInitialized
callsGetComputationClient
during teardown, which re-runsCreateClient
, which complains becauseg_computation_client_initialized
never got reset.In this PR, I only set
g_computation_client_initialized
after the actual runtime init completed without breaking, since there are guaranteed to be no other concurrent callers ofCreateClient
.